Mailing-List: contact cygwin-apps-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm
Sender: cygwin-apps-owner AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-apps-subscribe AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
List-Archive: <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin-apps/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin-apps AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-apps-help AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/lists.html#faqs>
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin-apps AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
Date: Fri, 18 May 2001 00:03:22 -0400
From: Christopher Faylor <cgf AT redhat DOT com>
To: cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com
Subject: Re: gcc-2.95.3-4 to mingw
Message-ID: <20010518000322.A4730@redhat.com>
Reply-To: cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com
References: <20010517141000 DOT A2669 AT redhat DOT com> <20010518035720 DOT 17116 DOT qmail AT web6401 DOT mail DOT yahoo DOT com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.11i
In-Reply-To: <20010518035720.17116.qmail@web6401.mail.yahoo.com>; from danny_r_smith_2001@yahoo.co.nz on Fri, May 18, 2001 at 01:57:20PM +1000

On Fri, May 18, 2001 at 01:57:20PM +1000, Danny Smith wrote:
>
>--- Christopher Faylor <cgf AT redhat DOT com> wrote: > Ok.  If I am going to
>be applying these patches, then I have a few
>> observations.
>> 
>> 1) They should not have MS-DOS line endings.
>> 
>> 2) They should not reference MS-DOS paths.
>> 
>> 3) I'm not going to add the word "mingw" to the compiler output for
>> the cygwin
>>    gcc compiler.  You are, of course, welcome to change that for any
>> mingw
>>    compiler.  I assume that you are doing that already.
>> 
>> 4) I'd appreciate a different ChangeLog entry for each directory that
>> is
>>    modified.  I can't use the one that you sent since it is
>> non-standard.
>> 
>> I'll try to use the patch that was submitted here by stripping the
>> CR's
>> and changing all of the paths to '/' but I would appreciate it if
>> future
>> submissions adhered to the above criteria.
>> 
>
>Thank you.

Btw, they applied cleanly (with one easily correctable exception), so you
can expect them in the next version of gcc.  Unless you are anticipating
sending in more patches, I'll try to make a test release next week.

cgf