Mailing-List: contact cygwin-apps-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm Sender: cygwin-apps-owner AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin-apps AT sources DOT redhat DOT com X-Apparently-From: Message-ID: <3AE2EC6F.1D5DA06F@yahoo.com> Date: Sun, 22 Apr 2001 10:36:31 -0400 From: Earnie Boyd Reply-To: Cygwin Apps X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.76 [en] (WinNT; U) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Paul Garceau CC: cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: GCC -mno-cygwin vs mingw32-gcc cross environment. References: <3AE07A27 DOT 3AAC7BE5 AT yahoo DOT com>; from earnie_boyd AT yahoo DOT com on Fri, Apr 20, 2001 at 02:04:23PM -0400 <3AE19065 DOT 1131 DOT 36976B AT localhost> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Paul Garceau wrote: > > I would agree with Chris...not to "deprecate", as Earnie states, but > to discourage the use of -mno-cygwin for anyone not familiar enough > with the differences between using -mno-cygwin vs not using -mno- > cygwin. > There has been a *ell of a lot of work put in to getting -mno-cygwin > to work over the years. I don't believe that effort should be wasted > by eliminating (or "deprecating", as Earnie puts it) the -mno-cygwin > switch. > Paul, see http://www.bartleby.com/61/54/D0145400.html for a definition of the word deprecate. As for the work in -mno-cygwin, I don't think the current maintainer would mind not having to support it any further. Besides it's a Cygwin specific and not a normal UNIX way of doing cross building. MinGW is foreign wrt Cygwin and should be treated as any other foreign host/target. Earnie. _________________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com