Mailing-List: contact cygwin-apps-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm
Sender: cygwin-apps-owner AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-apps-subscribe AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
List-Archive: <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin-apps/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin-apps AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-apps-help AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/lists.html#faqs>
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin-apps AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
Date: Sat, 17 Mar 2001 18:07:03 -0500
From: Christopher Faylor <cgf AT redhat DOT com>
To: cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com
Subject: Re: gcc 2.95.3-1 and -mwin32
Message-ID: <20010317180703.A23000@redhat.com>
Reply-To: cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com
References: <20010317172830 DOT A24346 AT redhat DOT com> <3AB3ECE7 DOT 26B3D8D3 AT ece DOT gatech DOT edu>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.11i
In-Reply-To: <3AB3ECE7.26B3D8D3@ece.gatech.edu>; from cwilson@ece.gatech.edu on Sat, Mar 17, 2001 at 06:01:59PM -0500

On Sat, Mar 17, 2001 at 06:01:59PM -0500, Charles S. Wilson wrote:
>Christopher Faylor wrote:
>> 
>> I've got gcc 2.95.3-1 ready to go.  It seems to work ok.
>
>[snip]
>
>> So, unless someone has a strong objection, the default for gcc 2.95.3-1,
>> gcc 3.0, and gcc 3.1 will be to include /usr/include/w32api.
>
>Q: Does that also mean that the default for gcc-2.95.3-1 on cygwin will
>be to #define WIN32 & WINDOWS in addition to merely including
>/usr/include/w32api in the include path?  e.g. that -mwin32 is the
>default now (again)?

I wasn't planning on doing this, no.  I still think that Cygwin should not
define these unless asked.

This does cause problems for some of the stuff in sources.redhat.com but
they are minor compared to the effort of adding -mwin32 everywhere that
it was needed.

So, this is still different from gcc-2.95.2-1.

cgf