Mailing-List: contact cygwin-apps-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm Sender: cygwin-apps-owner AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin-apps AT sources DOT redhat DOT com Date: Thu, 15 Mar 2001 12:45:40 -0500 From: Christopher Faylor To: cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: ncurses* subdirectories in /bin? Message-ID: <20010315124540.B3027@redhat.com> Reply-To: cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com References: <20010315104501 DOT A2086 AT redhat DOT com> <3AB0F295 DOT 63D1A6F5 AT ece DOT gatech DOT edu> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.11i In-Reply-To: <3AB0F295.63D1A6F5@ece.gatech.edu>; from cwilson@ece.gatech.edu on Thu, Mar 15, 2001 at 11:49:25AM -0500 On Thu, Mar 15, 2001 at 11:49:25AM -0500, Charles S. Wilson wrote: >/usr/bin/ncurses-stat/ > contains statically linked versions of the main ncurses utilities > (dynamically linked versions are in /usr/bin) > >/usr/bin/ncurses-test-dll/ > contains dynamically linked versions of the various ncurses test >utilities and demos > >/usr/bin/ncurses-test-stat/ > contains statically linked versions of the various ncurses test >utilities and demos > >These were an artifact of the -test builds for this complicated >package. However, once ncurses became 'stable' (hah!) I never >re-released a package that did NOT contain them. It's probably a good >idea to eliminate at least some of these; together, the three >directories contain 1.4M compressed, but the whole ncurses tarball is >only 2.4M compressed. > >/usr/bin/ncurses-test-dll/ is only 100k compressed. So, by eliminating >all the statically linked executables, we can cut the ncurses binary >tarball in half. Thoughts? I'm in favor of anything that cuts down the size of the tar balls and, maybe more importantly, the amount of space used on your hard disk. cgf