Mailing-List: contact cygwin-apps-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm Sender: cygwin-apps-owner AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin-apps AT sources DOT redhat DOT com Date: Tue, 20 Feb 2001 17:05:46 -0500 From: Christopher Faylor To: cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: MinGW libstdc++.a [WAS: Re: Has sys/stat.h changed] Message-ID: <20010220170546.A32414@redhat.com> Reply-To: cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com References: <3A91984B DOT 8F87DBCB AT yahoo DOT com> <20010219174210 DOT A21171 AT redhat DOT com> <3A91A59D DOT F673E6B7 AT yahoo DOT com> <20010219181240 DOT C21513 AT redhat DOT com> <3A9294F1 DOT 639E4A19 AT yahoo DOT com> <20010220141748 DOT A30769 AT redhat DOT com> <3A92E4F1 DOT E0E0D71B AT yahoo DOT com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.11i In-Reply-To: <3A92E4F1.E0E0D71B@yahoo.com>; from earnie_boyd@yahoo.com on Tue, Feb 20, 2001 at 04:43:13PM -0500 On Tue, Feb 20, 2001 at 04:43:13PM -0500, Earnie Boyd wrote: >Christopher Faylor wrote: >> >> On Tue, Feb 20, 2001 at 11:01:53AM -0500, Earnie Boyd wrote: >> >Christopher Faylor wrote: >> >> >> >> >> 4) Is anyone going to checkin a libstdc++.a into winsup/mingw so that I >> >> >> can add this to the distribution? >> >> > >> >> >I'm not ready for a new release of these. Please leave the existing >> >> >distribution. >> >> >> >> But we don't have anything now and people are reporting that Mumit's (old?) >> >> distribution works ok. Couldn't we just use that for the time being just >> >> to quiet the mailing list? >> >> >> > >> >A separate package would be best to distribute this. It could be named >> >mingw-libstdc++.tar.gz. The question I have is how to distribute the >> >source for just the library, it's already distributed with gcc source, >> >correct? So a README saying which package the source can be found would >> >suffice, correct? >> >> Do we really need a special package for one file, with all of the attendant >> problems that would result? Why can't it just be part of the mingw package >> itself? >> > >It would be easier for the gcc package itself to do that. The gcc >package already distributes the _G_config.h file in a mingw specific >directory under /usr/include/mingw32. The gcc package could also be >instructed to build and distribute the /usr/lib/mingw/libstdc++.a file. Ok. I can do this. I'd just like to be able to get it from a standard place, like checked into mingw. I'd rather not have to try to build it. cgf