Mailing-List: contact cygwin-apps-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm Sender: cygwin-apps-owner AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin-apps AT sources DOT redhat DOT com Message-ID: <00a501c098a4$885898a0$0200a8c0@lifelesswks> From: "Robert Collins" To: References: <20010217002929 DOT A31035 AT redhat DOT com> Subject: Re: Wipe out older versions in cygwin/latest, cygwin/contrib Date: Sat, 17 Feb 2001 16:43:17 +1100 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4133.2400 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4133.2400 X-OriginalArrivalTime: 17 Feb 2001 05:36:07.0451 (UTC) FILETIME=[86C4CEB0:01C098A3] Other than any GPL requirements.. Perhaps keeping the diffs from the next version backwards will do though. ----- Original Message ----- From: "Christopher Faylor" To: Sent: Saturday, February 17, 2001 4:29 PM Subject: Wipe out older versions in cygwin/latest, cygwin/contrib > Our connection to sources.redhat.com is really getting swamped lately > and it is all Cygwin's fault. > > When I look at what people are downloading, I see: > > /pub/cygwin/latest/gcc/gcc-2.95.2-3-src.tar.gz > > a lot. > > I don't know why this is, but I do know how to fix it -- I'll delete > the file. > > Is there really any reason to keep obsolete tarballs that are several > months old? I can't think of any. > > Unless someone has a good reason for keeping these, I'm going to > start deleting them. > > cgf >