Mailing-List: contact cygwin-apps-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm Sender: cygwin-apps-owner AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin-apps AT sources DOT redhat DOT com Date: Sat, 20 Jan 2001 01:25:11 -0500 From: Christopher Faylor To: cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: libreadline.dll.a missing functions. Message-ID: <20010120012511.F19629@redhat.com> Reply-To: cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com References: <3A661B21 DOT AA1A4875 AT yahoo DOT com> <3A662B83 DOT C3906A81 AT ece DOT gatech DOT edu> <3A674EC8 DOT 489392B4 AT ece DOT gatech DOT edu> <3A679E0D DOT EA1C4C27 AT yahoo DOT com> <3A67B56E DOT C01AF097 AT ece DOT gatech DOT edu> <3A684102 DOT 261BA9DD AT yahoo DOT com> <3A692F3D DOT 41E61F8E AT ece DOT gatech DOT edu> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.11i In-Reply-To: <3A692F3D.41E61F8E@ece.gatech.edu>; from cwilson@ece.gatech.edu on Sat, Jan 20, 2001 at 01:25:01AM -0500 On Sat, Jan 20, 2001 at 01:25:01AM -0500, Charles Wilson wrote: >AJ Reins hinted in another message in this thread that the readline >packaged within bash might be different than the standalone version. >So, it's probably best to just admit defeat (wrt bash) and require that >cygwin-bash be built using the internal readline library. And not >modify the export table to accomodate bash. > >Comments? I thought I remembered reading somewhere that bash was trying hard to use the released readline. Since they are both maintained by the same person, that's not hard to believe. You could always ask Chet about this. He's pretty responsive. From his signature: Chet Ramey, CWRU chet AT po DOT CWRU DOT Edu http://cnswww.cns.cwru.edu/~chet/ cgf