Mailing-List: contact cygwin-apps-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm
Sender: cygwin-apps-owner AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-apps-subscribe AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
List-Archive: <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin-apps/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin-apps AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-apps-help AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/lists.html#faqs>
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin-apps AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
Subject: RE: Anyone have any problems with external archives of this list?
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="iso-8859-1"
Date: Tue, 5 Dec 2000 17:17:02 +1100
content-class: urn:content-classes:message
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.0.4368.4
Message-ID: <188CAABFF1C6AD4D946FF2170CD8B7AA0709A4@itdomain002.itdomain.net.au>
Thread-Topic: Anyone have any problems with external archives of this list?
Thread-Index: AcBegtlWbbw89LGBRT2P8ax2+I7YgQAABFGw
From: "Robert Collins" <robert DOT collins AT itdomain DOT com DOT au>
To: <cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com>
Note-from-DJ: This may be spam
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by delorie.com id BAA16521

I don't think so. I get no spam on this account :] (without even using
ORBS on the mail server).

Rob
 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Christopher Faylor [mailto:cgf AT redhat DOT com]
> Sent: Tuesday, 5 December 2000 5:15 PM
> To: cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com
> Subject: Re: Anyone have any problems with external archives of this
> list?
> 
> 
> On Tue, Dec 05, 2000 at 12:27:08AM -0500, Christopher Faylor wrote:
> >I've just received a few requests from someone who 
> apparently wants to
> >archive this list at theaimsgroup.com.
> >
> >I've turned down a similar request for cygwin-developers but I was
> >wondering if anyone had any objections to archiving this list
> >externally.
> >
> >I've actually been thinking that cygwin-apps probably shouldn't be
> >per-approval anyway, so I'm not as concerned with potentially opening
> >an external gateway here as I am for cygwin-developers.
> >
> >So, are there any objections to allowing an archiving subscription?
> 
> Btw, I just noticed that all of our email addresses are being stored
> without any munging in these archives.  I wonder if this accounts for
> the incredible amount of spam that I receive at cgf AT cygnus DOT com.
> 
> cgf
>