Mailing-List: contact cygwin-apps-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm Sender: cygwin-apps-owner AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin-apps AT sources DOT redhat DOT com Message-ID: <39A2CE6C.7D32C24B@ece.gatech.edu> Date: Tue, 22 Aug 2000 15:03:08 -0400 From: Charles Wilson X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.7 [en] (X11; U; SunOS 5.7 sun4u) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Michael Ring CC: cygwin-apps AT sources DOT redhat DOT com Subject: Re: perl-5.6.0 ready for test! (IMPORTANT READ THIS MESSAGE ON MAINTAINER STATUS!) References: <20000822120810 DOT 11721 DOT qmail AT web106 DOT yahoomail DOT com> <20000822124410 DOT D28312 AT cygnus DOT com> <39A2C2E2 DOT CBDB94D1 AT ece DOT gatech DOT edu> <20000822143226 DOT A29889 AT cygnus DOT com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Michael Ring wrote: > >>Good idea? Bad idea? Tremendously stupid idea? Nice idea but would never > >>work in reality? > > Don't like that. I think there are enough lists already. I would only > like to see cygwin-apps as an open group like cygwin. (No allowance to > post needed) > > > > >I dunno. I think it would probably be best to just use the existing mailing > >lists for this. If we start making a mailing list for every cygwin package > >it will get pretty unmanageable. I'll be spending 90% of my time saying > >"This is off-topic for this mailing list". :-) A very good point, Chris. Okay, I bow to the wisdom of the majority and withdraw my suggestion. --Chuck