Mailing-List: contact cygwin-apps-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm list-help: list-post: Sender: cygwin-apps-owner AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin-apps AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com From: Chris Faylor Date: Mon, 3 Jul 2000 19:20:59 -0400 To: cygapp Subject: Re: SYSVSHM / MMAP question (newbie ) Message-ID: <20000703192059.F30846@cygnus.com> Mail-Followup-To: cygapp References: <033901bfe542$3967f620$f7c723cb AT lifelesswks> <20000703190847 DOT B30846 AT cygnus DOT com> <035f01bfe544$ebc02c00$f7c723cb AT lifelesswks> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2i In-Reply-To: <035f01bfe544$ebc02c00$f7c723cb@lifelesswks>; from robert.collins@itdomain.com.au on Tue, Jul 04, 2000 at 09:17:54AM +1000 On Tue, Jul 04, 2000 at 09:17:54AM +1000, Robert Collins wrote: >Chris, thanks for the answer & reference, >To answer whether I am porting an application, yes I am continuing work >on squid, (which is running happily under cygwin now), but the core >developers are discussing using mmap or sysvshm for some upcoming >development. The application - squid - does use the cygwin.dll at the >moment, and I do not plan to attempt making a -nocygwin port at this >stage. I am happy to be guided though - what list should I address >further questions to? This list is relatively general but I don't want it to become a place where people think they have a captive audience of knowledgable people. If you're porting an application to cygwin then it's an appropriate use of the list. I am, however, usually perplexed by questions of "is X implemented" when it is relatively easy to look at the sources and decide. Or, you can even do an "objdump -p" on cygwin1.dll to see if the function is exported. Why, as a last resort, you can even look at the project web page, which, in this case, actually mentions "System V shared memory calls". cgf