Mailing-List: contact cygwin-apps-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm list-help: list-post: Sender: cygwin-apps-owner AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin-apps AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com Date: Wed, 14 Jun 2000 00:33:30 -0400 From: Chris Faylor To: cygwin-apps AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com Cc: rdparker AT butlermfg DOT com, cwilson AT ece DOT gatech DOT edu Subject: Re: I *do* want to fix gcc/binutils Message-ID: <20000614003330.A17622@cygnus.com> Mail-Followup-To: cygwin-apps AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com, rdparker AT butlermfg DOT com, cwilson AT ece DOT gatech DOT edu References: <20000613200658 DOT A19673 AT cygnus DOT com> <20000613215310 DOT A17725 AT cygnus DOT com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2i In-Reply-To: <20000613215310.A17725@cygnus.com>; from cgf@cygnus.com on Tue, Jun 13, 2000 at 09:53:10PM -0400 On Tue, Jun 13, 2000 at 09:53:10PM -0400, Chris Faylor wrote: >On Tue, Jun 13, 2000 at 08:06:58PM -0400, Chris Faylor wrote: >>I'm downloading the gcc/binutils sources right now (for some reason it >>is taking forever). I was planning on applying Ron and Chuck's patches >>and trying to track down the _impure_ptr problem. I refreshed my memory >>on the problem with some email from Mumit. >> >>Ron, you were possibly going to upload a new version of gcc tonight, >>right? It doesn't fix the -mno-cygwin problem does it? Is anyone else >>investigating this? > >I think I've tracked down the problem and it seems to have a simple fix. >I'd be happy to provide the patch to anyone who has this stuff ready >to go. > >In the meantime, I'll start a build going and go play Word Racer on >games.yahoo.com ... The build didn't succeed. It stalled on building libobjc. It progressed far enough for me to test the version of gcc that I built. That didn't work either. It complained about various undefined symbols in tinfo.c. Maybe this is a result of plugging in a recent libiberty. Oh, and, of course, I'm cross building this on linux like I do all of my other net packages. I guess tomorrow I can try three-staging this to see if that works better. It might be a good idea to the same version of gcc that we release to build our packages anyway. cgf