Mailing-List: contact cygwin-apps-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
Sender: cygwin-apps-owner AT cygwin DOT com
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-apps-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive: <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin-apps/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-apps-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/lists.html#faqs>
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com
Date: Tue, 14 May 2002 11:50:07 -0400
From: Christopher Faylor <cgf AT redhat DOT com>
To: cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com
Cc: cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com
Subject: Re: diff and diff-utils in category base
Message-ID: <20020514155007.GE25899@redhat.com>
Reply-To: cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com
References: <FC169E059D1A0442A04C40F86D9BA7600C60B1 AT itdomain003 DOT itdomain DOT net DOT au>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <FC169E059D1A0442A04C40F86D9BA7600C60B1@itdomain003.itdomain.net.au>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.23.1i

On Tue, May 14, 2002 at 10:15:12PM +1000, Robert Collins wrote:
>Any reason why diff and diff-utils are in the 'base' category?
>
>They seem much more 'devel' to me.

I assume you've sent a similar query to the Debian people.

cgf