Mailing-List: contact cygwin-apps-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm Sender: cygwin-apps-owner AT cygwin DOT com List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Mail-Followup-To: cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com Subject: RE: New Packages Waiting! [WAS: New SGML/XML packages] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.0.5762.3 Date: Tue, 14 May 2002 21:39:25 +1000 content-class: urn:content-classes:message Message-ID: X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: From: "Robert Collins" To: "Nicholas Wourms" , Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by delorie.com id g4EBdY625446 I think no-one has had time. I recall several yea votes previously, so it just takes me/corinna/chris/chuck/ anyone else with write access to upload the packages. I don't recall who (if anyone) has sanity checked the packages for post-install scripts etc. I don't have time to sanity check the packages, but will upload if an existing maintainer can confirm the sanity of said packages. Rob > -----Original Message----- > From: Nicholas Wourms [mailto:nwourms AT yahoo DOT com] > Sent: Tuesday, May 14, 2002 8:44 PM > To: cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com > Subject: New Packages Waiting! [WAS: New SGML/XML packages] > > > Hi All, > > It has been 3 days since it was posted and, AFAIK, Jon has > gone through the proper procedure for becoming the maintainer > of the packages according to the packaging howto. Yet, there > has been no discussion or acknowledgement of their existence, > other then my earlier comment. If you recall, back in March > was when he first attempted to submit them, people became > sidetracked and, after he fixed all the issues that people > were complaining about, nothing was done to have them added. > Now he didn't use the [ITP] or [RFP], but that isn't stated > in the howto (perhaps it should be added?). Can someone > please look into this and get his packages added to the > distribution? This is really important step in achieving > full doc-tools capabilities in cygwin! If there is a > problem, could someone please explain it. I'm sorry if it > seems I am speaking for Jon, but I am a big advocate for this > functionality in cygwin (partly due to the fact most new > opensource and freesoftware builds its docs with some of > these tools). Thanks in advance for your cooperation and > understanding. The reference message containing all the > pertinent info and hint files is: > http://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin-apps/2002-05/msg00169.html Thanks, Nicholas __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? LAUNCH - Your Yahoo! Music Experience http://launch.yahoo.com