Mailing-List: contact cygwin-apps-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm Sender: cygwin-apps-owner AT cygwin DOT com List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Mail-Followup-To: cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: URL paths in setup.exe From: Robert Collins To: Earnie Boyd Cc: Earnie Boyd , Pavel Tsekov In-Reply-To: <3CD7D27E.446768EE@yahoo.com> References: <3CD7C79A DOT 55D8EA67 AT yahoo DOT com> <1020775239 DOT 623 DOT 0 DOT camel AT lifelesswks> <3CD7D27E DOT 446768EE AT yahoo DOT com> Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Date: 07 May 2002 23:28:58 +1000 Message-Id: <1020778139.538.2.camel@lifelesswks> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-OriginalArrivalTime: 07 May 2002 13:28:59.0398 (UTC) FILETIME=[252D5A60:01C1F5CB] On Tue, 2002-05-07 at 23:11, Earnie Boyd wrote: > Robert Collins wrote: > > > I'm open to ideas for renaming, but ... posix:// is wrong (it's not a > > posix provider per se - it's a cygwin mounted structure provider). (And > > posix:// is the most obvious alternative to cygfile:// for me.) > > The cygfile:// is fine, it's the reference to "MinGW land" which exists at > www.mingw.org that will confuse some search engine user that I'm concerned > with. You don't have a library for "MinGW land". You have methods that you use > use mingw to build or more precisely you use -mno-cygwin to build, correct? I was articulating what cygfile does for you. I wouldn't normally refer to it as MingW land :}. To be precise we have methods that execute using the mingw libc and provide access to the cygwin directory structure. The build process is irrelevant - real mingw or -mno-cygwin the result is the same. (Or maybe I'm just missing your point?) Rob