Mailing-List: contact cygwin-apps-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
Sender: cygwin-apps-owner AT cygwin DOT com
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-apps-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive: <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin-apps/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-apps-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/lists.html#faqs>
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com
Date: Thu, 25 Apr 2002 11:39:36 -0400
From: Christopher Faylor <cgf AT redhat DOT com>
To: cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com, Binutils <binutils AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
Subject: Re: cygwin ld import library issue fix (removing unused "_nm_" symbols)
Message-ID: <20020425153936.GA11827@redhat.com>
Reply-To: cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com, binutils AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com,
	Binutils <binutils AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
References: <001501c1ec43$6c7e6030$651c440a AT BRAMSCHE> <001b01c1ec4c$ed4c6140$651c440a AT BRAMSCHE>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <001b01c1ec4c$ed4c6140$651c440a@BRAMSCHE>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.23.1i

On Thu, Apr 25, 2002 at 01:32:47PM +0200, Ralf Habacker wrote:
>> Hi Danny,
>>
>> > Yes, this looks very nice, but does it works against current CVS?
>> This patch is a minor change, which could be reviewed easy, but I have got
>> trouble using the current cvs head (binutils 2-12.xx) release from
>> sources.redhat.com.>
>> It produces undefined symbols compiling dll/apps and that means cygwin support
>> seems to be broken. Because I hadn't enough time to check this, ....
>
>I've taken a look on the cvs archive to verify this. Are I'm right using the
>cygnus_cvs_20020108_pre tag ?

Why are you using a tag at all?  Your patches should be against the binutils
trunk.

cgf