Mailing-List: contact cygwin-apps-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm Sender: cygwin-apps-owner AT cygwin DOT com List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Mail-Followup-To: cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com content-class: urn:content-classes:message Subject: RE: [ANNOUNCEMENT] cygwin/xfree86 setup.exe packages with dependencies MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Date: Fri, 19 Apr 2002 08:14:35 +1000 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.0.5762.3 Message-ID: X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: From: "Robert Collins" To: Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by delorie.com id g3IMEjX20539 > -----Original Message----- > From: Christopher Faylor [mailto:cgf AT redhat DOT com] > Sent: Friday, April 19, 2002 1:16 AM > To: Robert Collins > Subject: Re: [ANNOUNCEMENT] cygwin/xfree86 setup.exe packages > with dependencies > > > On Thu, Apr 18, 2002 at 05:55:11PM +1000, Robert Collins wrote: > >> -----Original Message----- > >> From: Harold Hunt [mailto:huntharo AT msu DOT edu] > >> Sent: Thursday, April 18, 2002 3:30 PM > >> > >> Dependencies work for installing. The behavior I noticed > >> when uninstalling is that dependencies are ignored. I'm > >> guessing that setup.exe was designed that way because there > >> isn't really a good way to handle dependencies when uninstalling. > > > >Yeah. On uninstalling we need some user interaction, and the chooser > >isn't quite there to do that cleanly (yet). > > Did you see the apparent off-by-one problem in uninstalling, Robert? Seen it reported twice... should get to it this weekend. I'm not going to comment publicly until I review the code. Rob