Mailing-List: contact cygwin-apps-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
Sender: cygwin-apps-owner AT cygwin DOT com
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-apps-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive: <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin-apps/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-apps-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/lists.html#faqs>
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com
From: "Markus Hoenicka" <Markus DOT Hoenicka AT uth DOT tmc DOT edu>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-ID: <15539.104.987000.677306@gargle.gargle.HOWL>
Date: Tue, 9 Apr 2002 14:53:28 +0000
To: cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com
Subject: Re: SGML/XML packages available for testing
In-Reply-To: <20020409142353.GA4071@redhat.com>
References: <15538 DOT 63178 DOT 55000 DOT 272674 AT gargle DOT gargle DOT HOWL>
	<20020409142353 DOT GA4071 AT redhat DOT com>

Christopher Faylor writes:
 > Can you point me to a place in the cygwin package documentation which
 > indicates that p4-1 is a valid version number?  It isn't as far as
 > my understanding is concerned and I'd lke to rectify that.  I don't
 > see any way to unambiguously parse something like that.

Well, then "but then I might have misunderstood something" applies and
I'll have to change that. I've never understood what the 'P' is good
for anyway in TEI's version numbers.

regards,
Markus
-- 
Markus Hoenicka, PhD
UT Houston Medical School
Dept. of Integrative Biology and Pharmacology
6431 Fannin MSB4.114
Houston, TX 77030
(713) 500-6313, -7477
(713) 500-7444 (fax)
Markus DOT Hoenicka AT uth DOT tmc DOT edu
http://ourworld.compuserve.com/homepages/hoenicka_markus/