Mailing-List: contact cygwin-apps-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm Sender: cygwin-apps-owner AT cygwin DOT com List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com content-class: urn:content-classes:message Subject: RE: RFP: UPX (Was Re: reducing binary distribution size with UPX) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.0.5762.3 Date: Sun, 17 Mar 2002 10:15:51 +1100 Message-ID: X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: Thread-Topic: RFP: UPX (Was Re: reducing binary distribution size with UPX) Thread-Index: AcHNQEZ8uQfurIQaSYSiL5bb8q/9dAAADOhg From: "Robert Collins" To: "Stephano Mariani" , "Gerrit P. Haase" , "Lapo Luchini" Cc: Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by delorie.com id g2GNFxw02292 > -----Original Message----- > From: Stephano Mariani [mailto:sk DOT mail AT btinternet DOT com] > Sent: Sunday, March 17, 2002 10:14 AM > To: Robert Collins; 'Gerrit P. Haase'; 'Lapo Luchini' > Cc: cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com > Subject: RE: RFP: UPX (Was Re: reducing binary distribution > size with UPX) > > > I never intended to imply that the packages should be > distributed compressed, but perhaps UPX functionality could > (in the distant not so near future) be integrated into setup, > such that the installed files could be compressed at the > users discretion based on its size. :) Such things are certainly possible. Rob