Mailing-List: contact cygwin-apps-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm Sender: cygwin-apps-owner AT cygwin DOT com List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com content-class: urn:content-classes:message Subject: RE: RFP: UPX (Was Re: reducing binary distribution size with UPX) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.0.5762.3 Date: Sun, 17 Mar 2002 10:06:49 +1100 Message-ID: X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: Thread-Topic: RFP: UPX (Was Re: reducing binary distribution size with UPX) Thread-Index: AcHNIQB00LyLPGxqRIC6jBW28RGYBgAHhIag From: "Robert Collins" To: "Stephano Mariani" , "Gerrit P. Haase" , "Lapo Luchini" Cc: Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by delorie.com id g2GN6vv32268 > -----Original Message----- > From: Stephano Mariani [mailto:sk DOT mail AT btinternet DOT com] > Sent: Sunday, March 17, 2002 6:30 AM > To: 'Gerrit P. Haase'; 'Lapo Luchini' > Cc: cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com > Subject: RE: RFP: UPX (Was Re: reducing binary distribution > size with UPX) > > > Hi! > > I have used UPX a lot recently, and have found it very > useful; however, I would not recommend compressing all > binaries with it. Instead, to get a good compromise between > size and speed, why not just compress those files that are > the least used, and/or largest. Compressing any distributed files will be up to the individual maintainer. It's not something that a hard-and-fast call can be made on. I think that having it in the distro, for folk to use/test at their own discretion is useful though. Rob