Mailing-List: contact cygwin-apps-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm Sender: cygwin-apps-owner AT cygwin DOT com List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com Date: Sat, 16 Mar 2002 11:27:46 +0100 From: "Gerrit P. Haase" X-Mailer: The Bat! (v1.53t) Business Reply-To: "Gerrit P. Haase @ cygwin-apps" Organization: Esse keine toten Tiere X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Message-ID: <4935505233.20020316112746@familiehaase.de> To: Christopher Faylor Subject: Re: reducing binary distribution size with UPX In-Reply-To: <20020315165200.GB18094@redhat.com> References: <3C91ED8C DOT 45B068E0 AT lapo DOT it> <20020315165200 DOT GB18094 AT redhat DOT com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Hallo Christopher, Am 2002-03-15 um 17:52 schriebst du: >>UPX is quite cross-platform: you can use win32 version to package lonux >>a.out such as linux verison to package win32 PE. >>Moreover an UPX-compressed EXE is completely self-sufficient from UPX >>itself, has no memory overhead and decompresses very very fast (10Mb/sec >>on the author's Pentium133 as upx.sourceforge.net says). >>But if a cygwin native version is needed nonetheless I could volunteer to >>package it. [...] > It sounds from your description like I'll be able to run this on linux, > where I make all of my packages. Is that right? That's the only way > this will be useful for me. It is very much faster on Linux;) http://www.oberhumer.com/opensource/ucl/ http://upx.sourceforge.net/ Anyone counted the votes? 3 pro / 3 undecided / 1 contra? Gerrit -- =^..^=