Mailing-List: contact cygwin-apps-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm Sender: cygwin-apps-owner AT cygwin DOT com List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com Date: Sat, 16 Mar 2002 11:14:06 +0100 From: "Gerrit P. Haase" X-Mailer: The Bat! (v1.53t) Business Reply-To: "Gerrit P. Haase @ cygwin-apps" Organization: Esse keine toten Tiere X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Message-ID: <6834685384.20020316111406@familiehaase.de> To: Earnie Boyd CC: Robert Collins , Lapo Luchini , CygWin-Apps Subject: Re: RFP: UPX (Was Re: reducing binary distribution size with UPX) In-Reply-To: <3C91F6F4.DEE68FD2@yahoo.com> References: <3C91F6F4 DOT DEE68FD2 AT yahoo DOT com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Hallo Earnie, Am 2002-03-15 um 14:28 schriebst du: > Robert Collins wrote: >> >> > -----Original Message----- >> > From: Lapo Luchini [mailto:lapo AT lapo DOT it] >> > Sent: Friday, March 15, 2002 11:48 PM >> >> > But if a cygwin >> > native version is needed nonetheless I could volunteer to package it. >> >> IMO we should have a fully self-hosted distribution. At the moment, with >> the _single_ exception of postgresql, every package here can be rebuilt >> from source, to a version equivalent to what the package maintainer >> posted, on a cygwin system, with the tools that the distribution has. So >> yes, UPX should be a package before it's used to make packages. >> >> I vote for including UPX... and Lapo makes two. Do we need a third? And >> are there any objections? >> > Does UPX come with an API library that you can just use in setup? UCL is the library which is needed to build UPX. UCL: http://www.oberhumer.com/opensource/ucl/ UPX: http://upx.sourceforge.net/ Gerrit -- =^..^=