Mailing-List: contact cygwin-apps-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm Sender: cygwin-apps-owner AT cygwin DOT com List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com Message-ID: <3C56EBB3.7040700@ece.gatech.edu> Date: Tue, 29 Jan 2002 13:36:35 -0500 From: Charles Wilson User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US; rv:0.9.4) Gecko/20011019 Netscape6/6.2 X-Accept-Language: en-us MIME-Version: 1.0 To: cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: moratorium on new setup.exe features, please? References: <20020129145831 DOT GA32323 AT redhat DOT com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Christopher Faylor wrote: > Can we concentrate on releasing a new version of setup.exe, please? > > I'd like to eliminate the confusion that the current version of setup.exe > is causing. It seems like we are in a standard "add one more thing" mode > when people are experiencing real problems and real confusion with the > currently released setup.exe. > > The only thing that I really wanted for the next release was clickable > categories. We have quite a bit more than that so I assume there will > be additional unforeseen headaches coming. This is standard when you > add new features. The more features you add, the more headaches you'll > get. > > So, lets just concentrate on getting something out the door which solves > the known issues. The biggest known issue right now is the "How do I > install everything?" There's one more urgent issue: I have a bzip2 and libbz2_0 package waiting for release, and the new setup must be able to handle that name(*)...I think most of these changes are in Robert's sandbox right now, but there's also a necessary pending patch to dump_setup.cc(?) in winsup/utils/ (*) sure, I could rename it, but I really would rather not... IMO, this change is a bugfix on the current setup.exe, and not a new feature. YOMV... --Chuck