Mailing-List: contact cygwin-apps-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm Sender: cygwin-apps-owner AT cygwin DOT com List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com Message-ID: <3C4A553A.1080709@ece.gatech.edu> Date: Sun, 20 Jan 2002 00:27:22 -0500 From: Charles Wilson User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US; rv:0.9.4) Gecko/20011019 Netscape6/6.2 X-Accept-Language: en-us MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "Gary R. Van Sickle" CC: cygwin-apps AT sources DOT redhat DOT com Subject: Re: for the brave References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Gary R. Van Sickle wrote: >>-----Original Message----- >>From: cygwin-apps-owner AT cygwin DOT com >>[mailto:cygwin-apps-owner AT cygwin DOT com]On Behalf Of Robert Collins >> > >>I need a few testers: >> >>I've fixed the fault Corinna reported with in use files and upgrades. >>I'd like to know that it works on 9x (not tested properly just now), and >>if anyone can get it to fault - with reasonable behaviour. >> > > FWIW: Worked here (WinXP though) on an in-use cygwin1.dll (a hung bash process > actually). Hmmm....W2K it reports "REplaced in use file -- you need to reboot" or some such. BUT: I had no cygwin processes running. a) what file did it THINK was in use? b) why did it erroneously thing so? On the plus side, it accurately upgraded my system from readline-4.2 to readline-4.2a/libreadline5-4.2a/libreadline4-4.1 all-at-once. (The older version would've screwed that up unless I did the two-step shuffle) --Chuck