Mailing-List: contact cygwin-apps-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
Sender: cygwin-apps-owner AT cygwin DOT com
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-apps-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive: <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin-apps/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-apps-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/lists.html#faqs>
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com
Date: Fri, 18 Jan 2002 14:12:54 -0500
From: Christopher Faylor <cgf AT redhat DOT com>
To: cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com
Subject: Re: gcc -mno-cygwin STL support for setup.exe?
Message-ID: <20020118191254.GB28692@redhat.com>
Reply-To: cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com
References: <20020118180305 DOT GA2312 AT dothill DOT com> <20020118180632 DOT GA24778 AT redhat DOT com> <20020118185956 DOT GC2312 AT dothill DOT com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20020118185956.GC2312@dothill.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.23.1i

On Fri, Jan 18, 2002 at 01:59:57PM -0500, Jason Tishler wrote:
>> The biggest issue with relying on libstdc++.a for for setup.exe is that it
>> requires this library to be built for cross-compilation.  I have no idea how
>> to do that.
>
>I don't know either -- this is why I'm asking for help.

I think that was clear.  What I'm trying to say is that it may not be possible to use
functions from libstdc++.a.

In gcc 3.x, this will include things like new() and delete().

cgf