Mailing-List: contact cygwin-apps-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
Sender: cygwin-apps-owner AT cygwin DOT com
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-apps-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive: <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin-apps/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-apps-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/lists.html#faqs>
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com
Message-ID: <5DABF7424840D411BE9600508B6621F803794E80@exchukthis02.experian.co.uk>
From: "Ebrey, Carl" <Carl DOT Ebrey AT uk DOT experian DOT com>
To: "'cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com'" <cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com>
Subject: RE: bash completion (was: RE: Units)
Date: Wed, 19 Dec 2001 16:31:40 -0000
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19)
Content-Type: text/plain

That's what the webpage implies.  If that's not what it means, then surely
you have to agree that the page is confusing.

Carl

-----Original Message-----
From: Christopher Faylor [mailto:cgf AT redhat DOT com]
Sent: Wednesday, December 19, 2001 4:30 PM
To: cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com
Subject: Re: bash completion (was: RE: Units)


On Wed, Dec 19, 2001 at 04:21:17PM -0000, Ebrey, Carl wrote:
>I have to admit that I thought it was quite confusing too.  Perhaps if it
>said, "This rule also applies to Cygwin itself because Cygwin is also a
>package"?

Now, *that's* confusing.

So the cygwin package should say

@ cygwin
requires: cygwin

?

cgf


=======================================================================
Information in this email and any attachments are confidential, and may
not be copied or used by anyone other than the addressee, nor disclosed
to any third party without our permission.  There is no intention to
create any legally binding contract or other commitment through the use
of this email.

Experian Limited (registration number 653331).  
Registered office: Talbot House, Talbot Street, Nottingham NG1 5HF