Mailing-List: contact cygwin-apps-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
Sender: cygwin-apps-owner AT cygwin DOT com
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-apps-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive: <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin-apps/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-apps-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/lists.html#faqs>
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com
Message-ID: <3C16C852.9070202@ece.gatech.edu>
Date: Tue, 11 Dec 2001 22:00:34 -0500
From: Charles Wilson <cwilson AT ece DOT gatech DOT edu>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:0.9.4) Gecko/20010914
X-Accept-Language: en-us
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: CA List <Cygwin-Apps AT cygwin DOT com>
CC: Robert Collins <robert DOT collins AT itdomain DOT com DOT au>,
   Danny Smith <danny_r_smith_2001 AT yahoo DOT co DOT nz>
Subject: Re: gcc -mno-cygwin creates cygwin executables!
References: <FC169E059D1A0442A04C40F86D9BA760014A92 AT itdomain003 DOT itdomain DOT net DOT au> <3C16B987 DOT EACB76F1 AT yahoo DOT com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

Earnie Boyd wrote:

> Robert Collins wrote:
> 
>>What I'd love to see is a supported mingw cross-compiler :}.
>>
>>
> 
> Give me a week or two, well actually toward the middle of January.  It's
> in the works.  The question I have about this is, once we have a grand
> cross-compiler, should we get rid of -mno-cygwin?


IIRC, -mno-cygwin can't be removed because it is needed for the GNUpro 
side of things. Also, we need it to build cygwin itself; do we really 
want to require both a cygwin-gcc and a mingw-gcc in order to build 
cygwin1.dll and setup.exe?

--Chuck