Mailing-List: contact cygwin-apps-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
Sender: cygwin-apps-owner AT cygwin DOT com
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-apps-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive: <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin-apps/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-apps-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/lists.html#faqs>
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com
Date: 7 Dec 2001 11:05:59 -0500
Message-ID: <20011207160559.2349.qmail@lizard.curl.com>
From: Jonathan Kamens <jik AT curl DOT com>
To: bradshaw AT staff DOT crosswalk DOT com
CC: cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com
In-reply-to: <911C684A29ACD311921800508B7293BA037D286B@cnmail> (message from
	Mark Bradshaw on Fri, 7 Dec 2001 11:00:40 -0500)
Subject: Re: whois package
References:  <911C684A29ACD311921800508B7293BA037D286B AT cnmail>

>  From: Mark Bradshaw <bradshaw AT staff DOT crosswalk DOT com>
>  Date: Fri, 7 Dec 2001 11:00:40 -0500 
>  
>  Any good reason to pick that one versus the gnu package?

If the GNU one is as smart as its project page says it is, I suppose
not :-).

Well, OK, I suppose one reason is that the BW version is written in
Perl and is thus probably easier to package than a version that needs
to be compiled.

Also, why the heck does the GNU whois source include a "mkpasswd"
program?  I can't see how the two are related.

On the flip side, however, I notice that the GNU version is
internationalized, and I don't know if the BW version is.

  jik