Mailing-List: contact cygwin-apps-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm
Sender: cygwin-apps-owner AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-apps-subscribe AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
List-Archive: <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin-apps/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin-apps AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-apps-help AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/lists.html#faqs>
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin-apps AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
Message-ID: <029901c17081$9b2463f0$0200a8c0@lifelesswks>
From: "Robert Collins" <robert DOT collins AT itdomain DOT com DOT au>
To: "Gareth Pearce" <tilps AT hotmail DOT com>, <cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com>
References: <EA18B9FA0FE4194AA2B4CDB91F73C0EF7A48 AT itdomain002 DOT itdomain DOT net DOT au>	<3BE4D4A7	.2070900 AT ece DOT gatech DOT edu> 	<20011104104732 DOT X17306 AT cygbert DOT vinschen DOT de>	<1004867892 DOT 5388 DOT 54 DOT camel AT lifelesswks>  <3BE702C3 DOT 5010008 AT ece DOT gatech DOT edu> <1004999653 DOT 4685 DOT 20 DOT camel AT lifelesswks> <3BE71DF4 DOT 20802 AT ece DOT gatech DOT edu> <3BEFAA8F DOT 4020900 AT ece DOT gatech DOT edu> <3BF17502 DOT 6020902 AT ece DOT gatech DOT edu> <006101c16cd9$8c0e8770$0200a8c0 AT lifelesswks> <010e01c16cef$78c8be90$0200a8c0 AT lifelesswks> <3BF2CA1A DOT 34130B9D AT ece DOT gatech DOT edu> <03b901c16d51$b8f75500$0200a8c0 AT lifelesswks> <3BF2FE81 DOT C586876A AT ece DOT gatech DOT edu> <001501c16d6f$a9899c90$0200a8c0 AT lifelesswks> <3BF3180C DOT 8A99A5E8 AT ece DOT gatech DOT edu> <3BF5EEC6 DOT 4020803 AT ece DOT gatech DOT edu> <OE14CR34XtFT0D7GHzb000128aa AT hotmail DOT com> <3BF5FAF4 DOT 7090709 AT ece DOT gatech DOT edu> <OE53ZD948aiQdYlTIka000128ed AT hotmail DOT com> <009f01c17036$c0c07db0$0200a8c0 AT lifelesswks> <OE41kJUz8f96oAOGqbn00012fc5 AT hotmail DOT com>
Subject: Re: patches to vendor source trees - discussion
Date: Mon, 19 Nov 2001 09:37:28 +1100
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2600.0000
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2600.0000
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 18 Nov 2001 22:37:29.0319 (UTC) FILETIME=[9ACB4770:01C17081]

----- Original Message -----
From: "Gareth Pearce" <tilps AT hotmail DOT com>
To: <cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com>
Sent: Monday, November 19, 2001 6:34 AM
Subject: Re: patches to vendor source trees - discussion


> > Secondly, IMO setup.exe should _ask_ where the source should go, not
> > extract into /usr/src. The rpm way, at this point, becomes a
hinderance.
> > (How many CYGWIN directories do you want hanging around?).
>
> I think I just changed my mind...
> I now support #3 ... under the following condition
>
> that the setup 'ask where to install' allows support for an option
called
> 'in subdirectory by name' which takes the src package name and unpacks
it in
> a directory under the directory specified, named by taking the tarball
and
> going from start of name till first - or . (probably -).  So that I
could
> then put that as my default - and be happy.

I'll accept patches for this. IMO it's unneeded, but I've no objection
as long as it's not the default option.

> That combination thus allows for #3 and #4 in one.

Yep.

> Although I do think that some sort of standard for the name of
directory
> where built things are put, relative to the install directory, would
be
> good.  Which #1 #4 but not #3 have ... as far as I can remember.

#3 does - they get build under the source tree. I.e. in .build and
.install.

Rob