Mailing-List: contact cygwin-apps-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm Sender: cygwin-apps-owner AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin-apps AT sources DOT redhat DOT com X-Originating-IP: [198.142.166.217] From: "Gareth Pearce" To: References: <3BE4D4A7 .2070900 AT ece DOT gatech DOT edu> <20011104104732 DOT X17306 AT cygbert DOT vinschen DOT de> <1004867892 DOT 5388 DOT 54 DOT camel AT lifelesswks> <3BE702C3 DOT 5010008 AT ece DOT gatech DOT edu> <1004999653 DOT 4685 DOT 20 DOT camel AT lifelesswks> <3BE71DF4 DOT 20802 AT ece DOT gatech DOT edu> <3BEFAA8F DOT 4020900 AT ece DOT gatech DOT edu> <3BF17502 DOT 6020902 AT ece DOT gatech DOT edu> <006101c16cd9$8c0e8770$0200a8c0 AT lifelesswks> <010e01c16cef$78c8be90$0200a8c0 AT lifelesswks> <3BF2CA1A DOT 34130B9D AT ece DOT gatech DOT edu> <03b901c16d51$b8f75500$0200a8c0 AT lifelesswks> <3BF2FE81 DOT C586876A AT ece DOT gatech DOT edu> <001501c16d6f$a9899c90$0200a8c0 AT lifelesswks> <3BF3180C DOT 8A99A5E8 AT ece DOT gatech DOT edu> <3BF5EEC6 DOT 4020803 AT ece DOT gatech DOT edu> <3BF5FAF4 DOT 7090709 AT ece DOT gatech DOT edu> <009f01c17036$c0c07db0$0200a8c0 AT lifelesswks> Subject: Re: patches to vendor source trees - discussion Date: Mon, 19 Nov 2001 06:19:22 +1100 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2600.0000 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2600.0000 Message-ID: X-OriginalArrivalTime: 18 Nov 2001 19:19:25.0492 (UTC) FILETIME=[EF7B2F40:01C17065] > The thing I've been protesting all along is the directory structure. The > point being that its non-trivial to grab a couple of packages and > rearrange to suit the user. > > having the pristine source + 1 patch + the extracted dir means it is > easy and obvious what the user has to do to move the source elsewhere. and putting them in their own subdirectory named by the packaged would make it nice and trivial to move them arround or delete them or find them. Hence my design choice. > > Secondly, IMO setup.exe should _ask_ where the source should go, not > extract into /usr/src. The rpm way, at this point, becomes a hinderance. > (How many CYGWIN directories do you want hanging around?). I think I like asking where to put it, and that way is compatable with mine as well. So long as you can set it to remember. *pondering* Maybe we could have a .setuprc? > > Rob > >