Mailing-List: contact cygwin-apps-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm
Sender: cygwin-apps-owner AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-apps-subscribe AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
List-Archive: <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin-apps/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin-apps AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-apps-help AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/lists.html#faqs>
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin-apps AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
X-Apparently-From: <earnie?boyd AT yahoo DOT com>
Message-ID: <3BF2E8E9.E99BD65A@yahoo.com>
Date: Wed, 14 Nov 2001 16:58:01 -0500
From: Earnie Boyd <earnie_boyd AT yahoo DOT com>
Reply-To: CA List <Cygwin-Apps AT Cygwin DOT Com>
X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.77 [en] (WinNT; U)
X-Accept-Language: en
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Robert Collins <robert DOT collins AT itdomain DOT com DOT au>
CC: cygwin-apps AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
Subject: Re: RFP cygcheck
References: <046b01c16d56$01e7d470$0200a8c0 AT lifelesswks>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

Robert Collins wrote:

> Chris,
>     How do you feel about making cygcheck a separate package to
> cygwin1.dll.
>
> Why? becuase
> a) it's reporting on setup.exe issues as well as pure cygwin1.dll issues
> now.
> b) Updating setup may therefore require updating cygcheck, and I don't
> think that that should require updating 'cygwin'.
> c) With dependencies theres no concern about cygcheck not getting
> installed - just place it in base.

Why not extend this to all of winsup/utils?
--
Earnie.



_________________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com