Mailing-List: contact cygwin-apps-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm
Sender: cygwin-apps-owner AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-apps-subscribe AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
List-Archive: <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin-apps/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin-apps AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-apps-help AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/lists.html#faqs>
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin-apps AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
Date: Mon, 5 Nov 2001 23:27:04 +0100
From: Corinna Vinschen <cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com>
To: cygapp <cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com>
Subject: Re: patches to vendor source trees - discussion
Message-ID: <20011105232704.L17306@cygbert.vinschen.de>
Mail-Followup-To: cygapp <cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com>
References: <EA18B9FA0FE4194AA2B4CDB91F73C0EF7A48 AT itdomain002 DOT itdomain DOT net DOT au> <3BE4D4A7 DOT 2070900 AT ece DOT gatech DOT edu> <20011104104732 DOT X17306 AT cygbert DOT vinschen DOT de> <1004867892 DOT 5388 DOT 54 DOT camel AT lifelesswks> <3BE702C3 DOT 5010008 AT ece DOT gatech DOT edu> <20011105230511 DOT J17306 AT cygbert DOT vinschen DOT de> <3BE70EAC DOT 6000805 AT ece DOT gatech DOT edu>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i
In-Reply-To: <3BE70EAC.6000805@ece.gatech.edu>; from cwilson@ece.gatech.edu on Mon, Nov 05, 2001 at 05:11:56PM -0500

On Mon, Nov 05, 2001 at 05:11:56PM -0500, Charles Wilson wrote:
> Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> 
> > On Mon, Nov 05, 2001 at 04:21:07PM -0500, Charles Wilson wrote:
> > 
> >>My proposal (revised)
> >>   Use the standard RPM tree (SOURCES, BUILD, SPEC, RPMS, SRPMS)
> >>   -src is a tarball which contains
> >>     SOURCES/foo-VER-REL-orig.tar.bz2
> >>     SOURCES/foo-VER-REL.diff (creates the cgywin README)
> >>     SOURCES/foo-VER-REL-X.diff (if necessary)
> >>     SPECS/foo-VER-REL.*
> >>       .spec or .sh or .rule or whatever.
> >>   setup unpacks this into /usr/src/cygwin.
> >>   the end.  Nothing else is specified yet.
> >>
> > 
> > Your proposal has a disadvantage:  The src package isn't
> > compatible to the current packaging scheme.
> > 
> > ==> All packages have to be repacked.  A clear no-no, IMO.
> 
> 
> No, it IS compatible -- since you unpack the -src tarball at the 
> "usr/src/cygwin/ level, OLD style src tarballs will create this:
> 
> /usr/src/cygwin/foo-VER/*
> 
> NEW style src tarballs will create this:
> 
> /usr/src/cygwin/SOURCES/foo-VER-orig.tar.bz2
> etc.

Hmm, sounds ok.

> Granted, *ideally* you'd unpack new -src tarballs at the /usr/src/cygwin/ 
> level, and you'd unpack old -src tarballs at the /usr/src/ level, but I 
> don't think my way is too terrible...

No.  Repacking would be terrible.

Corinna

-- 
Corinna Vinschen                  Please, send mails regarding Cygwin to
Cygwin Developer                                mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Red Hat, Inc.