Mailing-List: contact cygwin-apps-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm
Sender: cygwin-apps-owner AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-apps-subscribe AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
List-Archive: <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin-apps/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin-apps AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-apps-help AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/lists.html#faqs>
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin-apps AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
From: "Gerrit P. Haase" <gp AT familiehaase DOT de>
Organization: Esse keine toten Tiere
To: Corinna Vinschen <cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com>
Date: Wed, 22 Aug 2001 09:52:58 +0200
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT
Subject: Re: perl, second shot (was: Re: first shot perl)
Reply-to: gp AT familiehaase DOT de
Message-ID: <3B8380FA.11581.1261A491@localhost>
In-reply-to: <20010822083055.A23221@cygbert.vinschen.de>
References: <20010821175029 DOT A24457 AT redhat DOT com>; from cgf AT redhat DOT com on Tue, Aug 21, 2001 at 05:50:29PM -0400
X-mailer: Pegasus Mail for Win32 (v3.12cDE)
X-Hops: 1
X-Sender: 320081107336-0001 AT t-dialin DOT net

Corinna Vinschen schrieb am 2001-08-22, 8:30:

>On Tue, Aug 21, 2001 at 05:50:29PM -0400, Christopher Faylor wrote:
>> On Tue, Aug 21, 2001 at 05:43:46PM -0400, Charles Wilson wrote:
>> >> WITH ntsec-harness i got these errors, i wonder why groups.t failed with 
>> >> ntsec in this previous build and failed not without ntsec.
>> >> Also dubious is the pragma/strict error.
>> >> One build before that i got a pragma/warnings error instead of pragma/strict.
>> >> 
>> >> Failed Test      Status Wstat Total Fail  Failed  List of Failed
>> >> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>> >> lib/glob-basic.t	               9    1  11.11%  8
>> >> op/groups.t     	               2    1  50.00%  1
>> >> pragma/strict.t 	              93    1   1.08%  21
>> >> 8 tests and 94 subtests skipped.
>> >> Failed 3/275 test scripts, 98.91% okay. 3/12830 subtests failed, 99.98% okay.
>> >> 
>> >> After that i patched into groups.t, but it changes nothing.
>> >
>> >Strange.  I'm willing to go ahead with this one, if it means having a 
>> >more proactive maintainer who's not MIA.  3 subtest failures 
>> >notwithstanding.  But eventually these should be investigated and squashed.
>> 
>> I remember group problems from back in the days when I was maintaining
>> a perl cygwin port (1997/1998).  I thought it was a getgroups problem.
>> But, then I thought this was fixed in cygwin for ntsec.
>
>I just tested groups.t. It first failed since one of my groups
>has a space in the name and the groups.t test is sensitive for
>that, unfortunately. I changed the group name to not contain
>spaces and then the test was ok running under both, a privileged
>and a non-privileged user account.
>
>This is with the current developers version of Cygwin, ntsec on.
>
>Corinna
>

Hmmm, i thought i patched the test according to the 'space'-issue.

I got this with cygwin-1.3.2:
=============================
$ groups.t
# groups=0(Jeder),544(Administratoren),545(Benutzer),11041(services)
# g0 = 0(Jeder) 544(Administratoren) 545(Benutzer) 11041(services)
# g1 = Jeder Administratoren Benutzer services
1..2
#gr1 is <Administratoren Benutzer Jeder services>
#gr2 is <Benutzer Jeder services>
not ok 1
ok 2

gph


-- 
=^..^=