Mailing-List: contact cygwin-apps-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm Sender: cygwin-apps-owner AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin-apps AT sources DOT redhat DOT com Date: Thu, 2 Aug 2001 14:36:31 -0400 Message-Id: <200108021836.OAA12734@envy.delorie.com> X-Authentication-Warning: envy.delorie.com: dj set sender to dj AT envy DOT delorie DOT com using -f From: DJ Delorie To: cwilson AT ece DOT gatech DOT edu CC: binutils AT sources DOT redhat DOT com, cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com In-reply-to: <3B699A88.7060904@ece.gatech.edu> (message from Charles Wilson on Thu, 02 Aug 2001 14:23:04 -0400) Subject: Re: [RFA] pei386 dll: auto-import patch References: <3B670087 DOT 7090102 AT ece DOT gatech DOT edu> <200108011735 DOT NAA32231 AT envy DOT delorie DOT com> <3B6846D2 DOT 9040206 AT ece DOT gatech DOT edu> <200108011847 DOT OAA32757 AT envy DOT delorie DOT com> <3B68C879 DOT 1070809 AT ece DOT gatech DOT edu> <200108020347 DOT XAA05289 AT envy DOT delorie DOT com> <3B68ED4B DOT 4080405 AT ece DOT gatech DOT edu> <200108020610 DOT CAA06564 AT envy DOT delorie DOT com> <3B68F80C DOT 7030207 AT ece DOT gatech DOT edu> <200108020700 DOT DAA06930 AT envy DOT delorie DOT com> <3B699A88 DOT 7060904 AT ece DOT gatech DOT edu> > Okay, new binaries and source tarball (plus the patch, ChangeLog, TODO > list, etc) are at: > > http://www.neuro.gatech.edu/users/cwilson/cygutils/robert-collins/latest/binutils/ + /* If we haven't found very symbol, let's look for its + import thunk */ Might want to check the text of this - found very symbol? Otherwise, approved. Please run a "make check" for gas/ld/binutils (cygwin+linux preferred) before and after applying, to make sure it doesn't break anything subtle. Thanks! Also don't forget to change the dates in the ChangeLog ;-) > This version supersedes the one I posted late last night, and includes > all suggestions so far from DJ (including the non-float math above) and > has been (minimally) tested by me. Open issues (other than more > thorough testing) are: > > make data_import_dll static? > No, used in both pe.em and pe-dll.c > I suppose we could rename it pe_data_import_dll. If you wish to rename it, consider that approved as well. > Ralf's bug report. My intuition sez this is > related to the data_import_dll thing. > http://sources.redhat.com/ml/binutils/2001-06/msg00742.html This can be addressed separately after the current patch is committed, but please do not forget about it once this patch is in!