Mailing-List: contact cygwin-apps-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm
Sender: cygwin-apps-owner AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-apps-subscribe AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
List-Archive: <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin-apps/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin-apps AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-apps-help AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/lists.html#faqs>
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin-apps AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
Delivered-To: fixup-cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com@fixme
From: "Paul Garceau" <pgarceau AT qwest DOT net>
Organization: New Dawn Productions
To: cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com
Date: Tue, 24 Apr 2001 16:20:50 -0700
Subject: Re: GCC -mno-cygwin vs mingw32-gcc cross environment.
Reply-to: Paul Garceau <pgarceau AT qwest DOT net>
Message-ID: <3AE5A7E2.29696.BCCF05@localhost>
In-reply-to: <3AE2EC6F.1D5DA06F@yahoo.com>
X-mailer: Pegasus Mail for Win32 (v3.12c)



On 22 Apr 2001, at 10:36, the Illustrious Earnie Boyd wrote:

> 
> Paul, see http://www.bartleby.com/61/54/D0145400.html for a definition
> of the word deprecate.

	Thanks Earnie...didn't know that was there.

>  As for the work in -mno-cygwin, I don't think
> the current maintainer would mind not having to support it any further.
> Besides it's a Cygwin specific and not a normal UNIX way of doing cross
> building.  MinGW is foreign wrt Cygwin and should be treated as any
> other foreign host/target.
> 
> Earnie.

	Peace,

		Paul G.


Nothing real can be threatened.
    Nothing unreal exists.