Mailing-List: contact cygwin-apps-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm Sender: cygwin-apps-owner AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin-apps AT sources DOT redhat DOT com X-Authentication-Warning: hp2.xraylith.wisc.edu: khan owned process doing -bs Date: Mon, 26 Mar 2001 10:39:03 -0600 (CST) From: Mumit Khan To: cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com cc: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: pthreads support In-Reply-To: <20010326103918.B7014@redhat.com> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII On Mon, 26 Mar 2001, Christopher Faylor wrote: > Not at all. I now dub you the official Cygwin pthreads maintainer. I've > been hoping that someone would step up to work on this and you've done > more in the last two or three weeks than has been accomplished in the > last two years. This is great news! Thanks for all the great work. Robert, The first "simple" testcase is gcc itself (configured with --enable-threads=posix), since gcc uses a very small subset of pthreads functionality, and that's what I'm going to try as soon as I get a chance to update my local tree. For a now-(temporarily-)abondoned glibc port to win32, I used the testcases from pthreads-win32 project [1], and some from the GNU Pth project [2] (I don't remember what my success rate was, only that it wasn't that high). [1] http://sources.redhat.com/pthreads-win32/ [2] http://www.gnu.org/software/pth/pth.html Regards, Mumit ps: The Reply-To is set to cygwin-apps; isn't this more appropriate for cygwin-dev list? I'm pruning cygwin-xfree.