Mailing-List: contact cygwin-apps-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm Sender: cygwin-apps-owner AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-apps-subscribe AT sources DOT redhat DOT com> List-Archive: <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin-apps/> List-Post: <mailto:cygwin-apps AT sources DOT redhat DOT com> List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-apps-help AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/lists.html#faqs> Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin-apps AT sources DOT redhat DOT com Date: Mon, 4 Dec 2000 21:02:26 -0500 From: Christopher Faylor <cgf AT redhat DOT com> To: cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Removing gcj from gcc release? Message-ID: <20001204210226.A30253@redhat.com> Reply-To: cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.11i I've now had a couple of requests from people who were distressed by the fact that gcj was available in the gcc 2.95.2 release but not libgcj. It seems like a good idea to me to just remove gcj from future gcc releases. Opinions? cgf