Mailing-List: contact cygwin-apps-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm Sender: cygwin-apps-owner AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin-apps AT sources DOT redhat DOT com Date: Mon, 20 Nov 2000 16:56:55 -0500 From: Christopher Faylor To: cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: New versions of bzip2 and patch? Message-ID: <20001120165655.A10710@redhat.com> Reply-To: cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com References: <20001120164800 DOT C9396 AT redhat DOT com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.11i In-Reply-To: ; from cwilson@ece.gatech.edu on Mon, Nov 20, 2000 at 04:53:07PM -0500 On Mon, Nov 20, 2000 at 04:53:07PM -0500, Charles Wilson wrote: > >On Mon, 20 Nov 2000, Christopher Faylor wrote: >> Grr. Email crossing. I thought he said that you had a version with a nice >> cyglibbz.dll (or whatever). > >Well, yeah -- but I sent it to him. Basically, we've been passing >patches back and forth, and I think we are currently >synchronized. The questions is, once it's uploaded which one of us >maintains it? I can upload it tonight as a test release, if there are no >objections. None from me. I don't care if you both want to maintain it. :-) Are there info files in bzip2? Didn't Michael indicate that he had a version of patch which correctly dealt with CRLF issues, too? cgf