DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.2 delorie.com 5BME5q9M672020 Authentication-Results: delorie.com; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=cygwin.com Authentication-Results: delorie.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=cygwin.com DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 delorie.com 5BME5q9M672020 Authentication-Results: delorie.com; dkim=pass (1024-bit key, unprotected) header.d=cygwin.com header.i=@cygwin.com header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=default header.b=mqF9onyj X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 47E2D4BA2E2B DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=cygwin.com; s=default; t=1766412351; bh=8mlcaE2ETB/8+d5VOzZLlMFMero/br0lnnvopvGNFWw=; h=Date:Subject:To:References:In-Reply-To:List-Id:List-Unsubscribe: List-Archive:List-Post:List-Help:List-Subscribe:From:Reply-To: From; b=mqF9onyjIC+IyizAdX3/e5NzwM86SiGUxlrxuAa6AEmFJVdLSR5FCJOzAFdgpJMEJ yoRHqZT4SKRrKDXBtwcF0oXHKH89rSSaqZYIss9AilsETA2A7HJ4GmVkqqe/S5r39Q gVYzmQvyI19Rf7htdS1hS1gQpOeEhUIW+J0M6UR0= X-Original-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.2 sourceware.org E3E7B4BA2E32 ARC-Filter: OpenARC Filter v1.0.0 sourceware.org E3E7B4BA2E32 ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=sourceware.org; s=key; t=1766412332; cv=none; b=eb1ImLHmhsSu3uCxoe183Y29CYky45PMD3crk0PRnFxAmZmZ4JSL+oM4kTR1ird/4dlhQa17Y8i71hJLfKcLqaOcYqeO1dSauVlC0G//qDx1MBWPFNCHJ3WBjXm6Utj4aCpjw0WmVQl1OPneCezVfhsuSt9au1rfzSg7MNbbH6g= ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=sourceware.org; s=key; t=1766412332; c=relaxed/simple; bh=N8rRnkOnYT2Yug6xCAzzCOImkAjRi7d44CgTvX4KGlQ=; h=DKIM-Signature:Message-ID:Date:MIME-Version:Subject:To:From; b=ssohQI2PmJzECdK9UHop8ZgPZmhFYkhE6exkPdTGRwneQz/Mo9hcTK1YIBfbCChAJILVZMBgVQdljVBeskBQtZoG+vX3eFVFuDuwrAYwv+YFN11JB/sY7/WxLQGPy6UZbFdqNE9DjVGqhLhCnrAbbi0fZ6Emy0jw00U4NNhxa+4= ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; server2.sourceware.org DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org E3E7B4BA2E32 X-Barracuda-Envelope-From: moss AT cs DOT umass DOT edu X-Barracuda-RBL-Trusted-Forwarder: 128.119.240.136 DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 mailsrv.cs.umass.edu 836995BDA0 X-Barracuda-RBL-Trusted-Forwarder: 172.26.69.67 Message-ID: Date: Mon, 22 Dec 2025 09:05:27 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:102.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/102.15.1 Subject: Re: Why is stat slow? Content-Language: en-US X-ASG-Orig-Subj: Re: Why is stat slow? To: Jakob Bohm , cygwin AT cygwin DOT com References: <74bdc787-9099-8e29-492a-588546b6eedb AT cs DOT umass DOT edu> <459d4abb-14fe-af09-f62d-defe3454e2c3 AT wisemo DOT com> In-Reply-To: <459d4abb-14fe-af09-f62d-defe3454e2c3@wisemo.com> X-Barracuda-Connect: mailsrv.cs.umass.edu[128.119.240.136] X-Barracuda-Start-Time: 1766412330 X-Barracuda-Encrypted: TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 X-Barracuda-URL: https://barramail.cs.umass.edu:443/cgi-mod/mark.cgi X-Virus-Scanned: by bsmtpd at cs.umass.edu X-Barracuda-Scan-Msg-Size: 1995 X-Barracuda-BRTS-Status: 1 X-ASG-Debug-ID: 1766412330-24039d6c3d4f09f0001-w5GHUG X-Barracuda-Spam-Score: 0.00 X-Barracuda-Spam-Status: No, SCORE=0.00 using global scores of TAG_LEVEL=3.5 QUARANTINE_LEVEL=10.0 KILL_LEVEL=9.7 test= X-Barracuda-Spam-Report: Code version 3.2, rules version 3.2.3.125474 Rule breakdown below pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- X-BeenThere: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.30 List-Id: General Cygwin discussions and problem reports List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , From: Eliot Moss via Cygwin Reply-To: Eliot Moss Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; Format="flowed" Sender: "Cygwin" On 12/22/2025 8:57 AM, Jakob Bohm via Cygwin wrote: > As a longtime aficionado of these issues, Cygwin/MSYS2 stat() function is > inherently slower than native Linux/WSL stat() syscall, because the native > stat returns data already kept and cached for each file system inode/MFTE, > while the Cygwin emulation goes through a lot of hoops to synthesize similar > information from a variety of file system data . The call path that uses > GetFileInformationByHandle() is the closest to a native fast implementation, > but unfortunately, most 21st century antivirus solutions tend to initiate a > full "scan file on open to prevent passing infected data to vulnerable > applications" cost when doing the proforma file open to get the file handle > needed for the GetFileInformationByHandle() call or other low risk checks . > Another set of hoops in the stat() code is the synthesis of a simulated set > of mode bits, which tends to bring in the entire ACL reinterpretation logic > as well as detection of various symlink approximations (it would be faster > to simply treat all "reparse points" as symlinks and add logic to readlink() > that deals with the various native types, but that would loose the ability > to create file system symlinks without the Administrator privilege of > creating the more dangerous system objects also named "symlink" ). > If the false triggering of AV scanning can be avoided, streamlining the > Cygwin stat() code could greatly speed up heavy users of stat() such as the > find and du commands . Thank you, Jakob! That gives me some interesting ideas. First, one of my mount lines indicates noacl, so I may be avoiding that cost. (I am still a little confused about having two mount lines and wonder which one takes precedence (or some combination?).) Concerning antivirus, maybe I can turn it off for that drive. It stores only tings I explicitly put there, which should not need scanning for safety. Regards - Eliot -- Problem reports: https://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: https://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: https://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: https://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple