DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.2 delorie.com 58N9pb8B2069415 Authentication-Results: delorie.com; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=cygwin.com Authentication-Results: delorie.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=cygwin.com DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 delorie.com 58N9pb8B2069415 Authentication-Results: delorie.com; dkim=pass (1024-bit key, unprotected) header.d=cygwin.com header.i=@cygwin.com header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=default header.b=kleYeDa+ X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 88CDB385840F DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=cygwin.com; s=default; t=1758621095; bh=UZIrecadNRio7zgYtQi8hcy7Pw88bgya73YpyF7IZcY=; h=References:In-Reply-To:Date:Subject:To:List-Id:List-Unsubscribe: List-Archive:List-Post:List-Help:List-Subscribe:From:Reply-To: From; b=kleYeDa+PhLb7bH8NYRLTarOvuHW53k/YEIBU64ulj8GDCwCawSA86A6ST3wH04Ab JngTbhdGdN9iTY1DZZcIRXjCHnJZz8GoXFmXgWMFqtgOHE64O/3Vcj0Ub3xFtLZ2Nr xeOBUygIil+5bDZyOvHtnNpyBYU3+oTpWMfF2kQ4= X-Original-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.2 sourceware.org 4AAD03858D26 ARC-Filter: OpenARC Filter v1.0.0 sourceware.org 4AAD03858D26 ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=sourceware.org; s=key; t=1758621027; cv=none; b=br+r8fZtCb86fs0M7pUTu0vBHkbMVf8jJrIhthQQ5qQ0PPQZqFhCt1ovjpfQOPxKaKzOAxBN6S1pn30rMLaVyFpypF5q//XrU3D0xd6xYbNLp4WJJlJxhMag5d9pAflDMNqkxTVWsHq9fqkHfzm4cXz9skVVGXXKvbBPsx2hjek= ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=sourceware.org; s=key; t=1758621027; c=relaxed/simple; bh=T84Z11SylqJ9BGAVcjx/sVXAuLqxCtB/Vr+/+ii2M24=; h=DKIM-Signature:MIME-Version:From:Date:Message-ID:Subject:To; b=eUd/8qya2GJppiNuSlxPqmzlh2pnSfUVxWGANZsCKzDDWdkXMwRlC7S9DjqGbyE6anCoXFEOXJm3T58u7sqy+oPMmT36ES278Vh2vV5RTuVlFNcsJPeNSpfqarE96AYyCCT1rcB0HXz1I8Qv9znWZfPG9gIYX8O3VCOxiEm6bwE= ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; server2.sourceware.org DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 4AAD03858D26 X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1758621025; x=1759225825; h=to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references:mime-version :x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=NzyKslDtKFI2hYYTix8J6aWGQoAZzeiprd3NLq0xphU=; b=agkOd9wiOkJ3CXBrexseMw2HF+QYrK92xVq95WREzab0HOLGHpm+MGLJhqnmieXFUB MnpljOsMBipArfOH1Ev2tbqIrqIbSnWMJAtsmBSJXSXnj2sLssRd+TE3IV5QuKq2zW4X w+LApBNn98/1ss4IH+MDXJYkvWl1coGF8GC2epU9PwS32aYpEhmSMc/HsPDLCKRuDdev CtvcNockl5jXQg5O3RRttzjTyRvQBa2PlPN9Ktybpgm104NmDkNSwbLl9EUdu42uloyp lor7rYXSl2u/DPPPAGU28KFZhV37RMxrzKCrOx8fyDy+fLyDh+OvwSfvgcRZOsagfJMs +wKQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YxTlFfi8uhuG7gL9NkLi2CC3DZwcVNdyJNzQC6smAxAik9zSlQB BkuiTn5l/SyIeBsIcbpLhq8b+klpSv7jTDdmegUWjwuGvODis9o4x/ZMPqkRItnk7rIjK1jg9Kc bP7J9OtZRRxoGtgZgITAFWlVXGoUR3/YkqIgM X-Gm-Gg: ASbGncvQ8y664+kygUKKYpjy2EMRVI2IhD45YKXuVG53gNZvdq5jXnaTPsUmXUlbeCC qEPm9Drwr2DCSujmqcnS6qt6NgATEqSf+HIb+V3Z2fQlDOWy8+5/l8Y3A92RAL/KMpD01FSHldX AAfstB8zKceuRxcLISJ9dp+qh1L1A+o4kCX7ecLVzDTM8d5G/O4LTlOQmEaJlKPSw0J9u87rvQ1 4f2E60= X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IGZAJY2jrkbTw6oWTlj8m0SORqtclqrvkVUdhJyaaPo71+gmwo+lvQJOTmSzRZDl2wp9cRoN/vPZsihGnQT0pM= X-Received: by 2002:a17:907:60d3:b0:b1d:368e:3ae5 with SMTP id a640c23a62f3a-b3020f1e2a5mr177621566b.0.1758621024741; Tue, 23 Sep 2025 02:50:24 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <631f0af5-d05c-cb33-956f-b1c284a37766 AT jdrake DOT com> In-Reply-To: <631f0af5-d05c-cb33-956f-b1c284a37766@jdrake.com> Date: Tue, 23 Sep 2025 11:49:48 +0200 X-Gm-Features: AS18NWBXrjN7wq3c6KWqnK28rsKYcKS6w5UiS_rMzG5anaw_IlBqQpK6m7J9mho Message-ID: Subject: Re: Why does Cygwin not use MiCloneProcessAddressSpace() for fork() To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com X-BeenThere: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.30 List-Id: General Cygwin discussions and problem reports List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , From: Lionel Cons via Cygwin Reply-To: Lionel Cons Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: "Cygwin" On Mon, 22 Sept 2025 at 23:28, Jeremy Drake via Cygwin wrote: > > On Mon, 22 Sep 2025, Mark Liam Brown via Cygwin wrote: > > > Greetings! > > > > Why does Cygwin not use MiCloneProcessAddressSpace() for fork()? That > > function was added for the Windows Services for UNIX, and it still > > working in Windows 11. > > > > Mark > > > > This is a perennial question, and the short answer is that it doesn't play > well with win32 dlls. Replies turned up via simple search: > > https://cygwin.com/pipermail/cygwin/2016-January/225571.html > https://cygwin.com/pipermail/cygwin/2018-January/235767.html Maybe those bugs were fixed in the meantime? UWIN has threads, uses DLLs (UWIN build DLLs, stock Windows DLLs, 3rd party DLLs, ...) and obviously has full console support (even tmux works). I also would be VERY happy to escalate any bugs related to RtlCloneUserProcess() in Cygwin. Very few things (except proof for extensions to THE Standard Model) would make me more happy than a faster (RtlCloneUserProcess() based) fork() in Cygwin. Lionel -- Problem reports: https://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: https://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: https://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: https://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple