DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.2 delorie.com 58MBuhQj1446513
DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.2 sourceware.org 0F01A3858290
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <CAN0SSYzFKJoZRU7fCm4YKH5O_J3SMvCjjgfua7zUJQL4Zj3rzA AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
 <CAN0SSYzB77kcuM-jzRkpDhx6ncpGP0kb70W7goXF4ZHAtdzaLg AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
In-Reply-To: <CAN0SSYzB77kcuM-jzRkpDhx6ncpGP0kb70W7goXF4ZHAtdzaLg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 22 Sep 2025 13:55:39 +0200
Message-ID: <CAPJSo4VqoYWXCd1fszbupfMtsiFfrb1L9-udRnDgqnX1e5wHgg@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Why does Cygwin not use MiCloneProcessAddressSpace() for fork()
To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
From: Lionel Cons via Cygwin <cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
Reply-To: Lionel Cons <lionelcons1972 AT gmail DOT com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Sender: "Cygwin" <cygwin-bounces~archive-cygwin=delorie DOT com AT cygwin DOT com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit

On Mon, 22 Sept 2025 at 12:49, Mark Liam Brown via Cygwin
<cygwin AT cygwin DOT com> wrote:
>
> On Mon, Sep 22, 2025 at 12:35 PM Mark Liam Brown
> <brownmarkliam AT gmail DOT com> wrote:
> >
> > Greetings!
> >
> > Why does Cygwin not use MiCloneProcessAddressSpace() for fork()? That
> > function was added for the Windows Services for UNIX, and it still
> > working in Windows 11.
>
> This is exposed to the userspace as NtCreateProcessEx() as documented
> in https://github.com/huntandhackett/process-cloning

That is the basis for RtlCloneUserProcess(), which AT&T UWIN and SFU use.

This is also the reason why UWIN runs circles around Cygwin in terms
of fork() performance, which directly affects performance of shell
scripts and /bin/make. That's also the reason we still have UWIN5 in
use, Cygwin has terrible fork() performance.


Lionel

-- 
Problem reports:      https://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ:                  https://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation:        https://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info:     https://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple