DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.2 delorie.com 56LHFOY13078804
Authentication-Results: delorie.com; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=cygwin.com
Authentication-Results: delorie.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=cygwin.com
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 delorie.com 56LHFOY13078804
X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com
X-Original-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.2 sourceware.org 2C9E83858D32
ARC-Filter: OpenARC Filter v1.0.0 sourceware.org 2C9E83858D32
ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=sourceware.org; s=key; t=1753118074; cv=none;
 b=iLWvuYHCObUV8Oxj5OH4Gqejxw9mUeukxi5LhsjWnUKQQptubs3eDIcuOl+6fG1ZICQO6T0VQmPQB+78tbM3+PHAToPyU10GW8tKtBo5FlxShEESElw3j/g7fxJcfMTNsHvCPEWeg6LUFelo3S46XO2e0MI7NFSyX3w8E5pbUTg=
ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=sourceware.org; s=key;
 t=1753118074; c=relaxed/simple;
 bh=UiXTOYWL0qm4Mhl+uYEb7dnSC+1Xjmn6MVPqyW6aJ38=;
 h=DKIM-Signature:From:To:Subject:Date:Message-ID:MIME-Version;
 b=i0u5kfCqOA8uGxmRH03iKHynunLtCIxn4DLBwZGEiWnv4Zg6qK/2dwTTCRdOQmAJ6XSe1lxnoM8hhNcZDVFE7Ik/ugidsKc2VQOOnyLGP8SxYRrNnWiEmbKXccEVP8nuk2XrfZN1WvQu8g4p+rYMd89avyWjoq7lgLr0hWeAPqQ=
ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; server2.sourceware.org
To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject: Re: SLOW ls(1) - cygwin dir lookups with WinNT async requests?
In-Reply-To: <CA+1jF5rbmDgawqu4QsYVRVTH+JgGf6GByxUKKy84RDjejOnihw@mail.gmail.com>
 (=?utf-8?Q?=22Aur=C3=A9lien?= Couderc via Cygwin"'s message of "Mon, 21 Jul
 2025 17:19:00 +0200")
References: <CA+1jF5rhwmUqe9-gMwDK6FioS13GRkLd0XyxUHeT5=-ycYUpxg AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
 <45887d0a-17d3-40ce-bea5-13fdf9081edd AT systematicsw DOT ab DOT ca>
 <CA+1jF5psDkbym84tM-=C8VRGfSzLYPrOy-_KMYLBNqwj+ds_Tg AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
 <3da288a3-3a70-41ca-b582-67500ae0fb9e AT SystematicSW DOT ab DOT ca>
 <CA+1jF5rJzWh0r3TUWjOA-EqEFW6KMaOqef-=_k530r4ZJSt=gQ AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
 <1833586910 DOT 20250718134434 AT yandex DOT ru>
 <CA+1jF5rbmDgawqu4QsYVRVTH+JgGf6GByxUKKy84RDjejOnihw AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
Date: Mon, 21 Jul 2025 19:13:51 +0200
Message-ID: <87seipwjow.fsf@Gerda.invalid>
User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13)
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-purgate-type: clean
X-purgate: clean
X-purgate-size: 1371
X-purgate-ID: 155817::1753118038-D6C732B1-A7D6F8CF/0/0
X-BeenThere: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.30
Precedence: list
List-Id: General Cygwin discussions and problem reports <cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://cygwin.com/mailman/options/cygwin>,
 <mailto:cygwin-request AT cygwin DOT com?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://cygwin.com/pipermail/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-request AT cygwin DOT com?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://cygwin.com/mailman/listinfo/cygwin>,
 <mailto:cygwin-request AT cygwin DOT com?subject=subscribe>
From: ASSI via Cygwin <cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
Reply-To: ASSI <Stromeko AT nexgo DOT de>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Errors-To: cygwin-bounces~archive-cygwin=delorie DOT com AT cygwin DOT com
Sender: "Cygwin" <cygwin-bounces~archive-cygwin=delorie DOT com AT cygwin DOT com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-MIME-Autoconverted: from base64 to 8bit by delorie.com id 56LHFOY13078804

Aurélien Couderc via Cygwin writes:
>> > I think you misunderstand me. I am suggesting to improve the Cygwin
>> > implementation of opendir(), readdir() and friends to do Win32/WInNT
>> > calls async to speed up dir listings.
>>
>> If you know how it can be done, why not provide a patch?
>
> Because I am not YET qualified? This is god level Cygwin hacking
> level, like Corinna Vinschen can do. I'm just a student, doing some
> ReactOS/Windows hacking.

You could at least demonstrate that doing the async calls you mention
are in fact improving the time it takes to gather the necessary
information vs.  a sequential implementation.  No Cygwin hacking is
required to do that.  As it stands, you are assuming it does, but have
shown absolutely no data.  I would counter that NTFS is not a fast
filesystem in any way, shape or form and in my experience does not
respond with all that much scaling if hit with parallel requests (that
also depends on the type of device targeted).  But I too have not looked
at the exact same sequence of calls that you are proposing to do
asynchronously.  So again, data needed… care to provide some?


Regards,
Achim.
-- 
+<[Q+ Matrix-12 WAVE#46+305 Neuron microQkb Andromeda XTk Blofeld]>+

SD adaptation for Waldorf rackAttack V1.04R1:
http://Synth.Stromeko.net/Downloads.html#WaldorfSDada

-- 
Problem reports:      https://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ:                  https://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation:        https://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info:     https://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple