DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.2 delorie.com 53M8w07u1481081 Authentication-Results: delorie.com; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=cygwin.com Authentication-Results: delorie.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=cygwin.com DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 delorie.com 53M8w07u1481081 Authentication-Results: delorie.com; dkim=pass (1024-bit key, unprotected) header.d=cygwin.com header.i=@cygwin.com header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=default header.b=eyHGa4oK X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 9300B3857C5D DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=cygwin.com; s=default; t=1745312278; bh=ZSEGhvjUv/rqpdBkH48IMtRw2Dw7o7RR7x38kJaJwOY=; h=Date:Subject:To:References:In-Reply-To:List-Id:List-Unsubscribe: List-Archive:List-Post:List-Help:List-Subscribe:From:Reply-To: From; b=eyHGa4oKSWHzh/WdWC5FY2OGeOtBLoHVOP09dcs3YkHDEG0/69ZdQ6WL7LPgQbPgE u/bGiXM2gVbQxaR16Bla17xUdX/M6iIQDF9cgNiI7owJeptUEFmuK1sPOHclp14Wzo 2j20jCgrVeCZ9qZNgbOXE+YixEZUwrHRpbREI0TU= X-Original-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.2 sourceware.org 29A263858420 ARC-Filter: OpenARC Filter v1.0.0 sourceware.org 29A263858420 ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=sourceware.org; s=key; t=1745312248; cv=none; b=awnvfQtqaOEnTrFi3/92D1rVb9O5GCsY6TV82pU1mu8NQ8wY5i5qRLJ0uqDE3FSzRlbafYZ8cXZH0Iv5dswPSLwDmliGwLsZ6eE2zqXFrArb8ZARRLmVSHnbqt7JnWUx2BTC/QsK2cP+5lYK9p91zbj/RlGbOgKqNRsggfmRJvY= ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=sourceware.org; s=key; t=1745312248; c=relaxed/simple; bh=OuuOb7UoH4s3aLGwdQh8ikrWl/zpfdy0gvW4Ug97enk=; h=Message-ID:Date:MIME-Version:Subject:To:From; b=Fc/RygB6hOMmTDW+BHIZmw5iFHWrAm02hDGE3tZqyctHvnTTqbHj0lncyfNTryYPpmJPRtWtY4S4fz8zjXCOgaU037b8gGS8Vju7wlLDcG7sqgTdT9VLEm3r3c1EfwVYN7AQjOSL7wh6lpXd449Sy9F4tjDPLJbHLYkXc+qrm5k= ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; server2.sourceware.org DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 29A263858420 X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at smtp02.aussiebb.com.au Message-ID: <45ec3ed2-a3a6-45bd-bad4-3a150f78fb90@shaddybaddah.name> Date: Tue, 22 Apr 2025 18:57:20 +1000 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Subject: Re: Cygwin SSHD session unable to access cloud/OneDrive files To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com References: <434339af-faac-4907-a256-db2f321b7c72 AT shaddybaddah DOT name> <87mscxt9sg.fsf@> <71f5b20c-2070-4adf-bab2-a43d86d20147 AT shaddybaddah DOT name> Content-Language: en-US In-Reply-To: X-BeenThere: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.30 Precedence: list List-Id: General Cygwin discussions and problem reports List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , From: Shaddy Baddah via Cygwin Reply-To: Shaddy Baddah Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; Format="flowed" Errors-To: cygwin-bounces~archive-cygwin=delorie DOT com AT cygwin DOT com Sender: "Cygwin" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-MIME-Autoconverted: from base64 to 8bit by delorie.com id 53M8w07u1481081 Hi, On 8/04/2025 9:14 pm, Corinna Vinschen via Cygwin wrote: > On Apr 4 16:23, Shaddy Baddah via Cygwin wrote: >> On 4/04/2025 10:02 am, Shaddy Baddah via Cygwin wrote: >>> Hi, >>> >>> On 4/04/2025 4:49 am, ASSI via Cygwin wrote: >>>> Shaddy Baddah via Cygwin writes: >>>>> If I connect an SSH session via the "native" OpenSSH instance >>>>> integrated into Windows, I can do something like the following to a, >>>>> at the time, online only, not yet downloaded file, and OneDrive will >>>>> download it ahead of outputing it: >>>> […] >>>>> But if I connect an SSH session via the Cygwin instance running on a >>>>> different port to 22, it does not trigger the provider to download the >>>>> file, and I see this error: >>>> […] >>>>> The fact that the native SSH session is OK suggests to me that there >>>>> is some newer type of security token that that service obtains that >>>>> the Cygwin SSH service does not. But I've not looked into it too hard. >>>> No, that suggests that you have logged into your SSh session without >>>> providing a password.  Windows will revoke all network access that >>>> requires authentication for such sessions. >>> Thanks for the reminder, but it's not that. I definitely logged in. And >>> amazingly, it's more than 20 years ago I was helped on this list to >>> understand this nuance, I think with regards to running Oracle's sqlplus >>> command line. Speculating... it appears registry keys for the sync'ed >>> portions of the filesystem are usually subkeys under >>> HKLM/SOFTWARE/Microsoft/Windows/CurrentVersion/Explorer/SyncRootManager/ >>> That suggests tie-in with Explorer... which suggests the Shell >>> extensions are not active somehow? I speak with complete lack of >>> authority of course. One thing I could maybe do though, is profile the >>> forked process layout in Process Explorer, maybe look at which DLLs are >>> in scope for the relevant shell processes. I don't know how much that >>> would help. -- Regards, Shaddy >>> >> Apologies for the formatting error. >> >> Thanks for the reminder, but it's not that. I defintiely logged >> in. And amazingly, it's more than 20 years ago I was helped on this >> list to understand this nuance, I think with regards to running >> Oracle's sqlplus command line. >> >> Speculating... it appears registry keys for the sync'ed portions of >> the filesystem are usually subkeys under >> HKLM/SOFTWARE/Microsoft/Windows/CurrentVersion/Explorer/SyncRootManager/ >> That suggests tie-in with Explorer... which suggests the Shell >> extensions are not active somehow? I speak with complete lack of >> authority of course. > I checked the Windows OpenSSH code and I don't see any relevant > difference between the way MSFT OpenSSH uses LsaLogonUser and the way > Cygwin does it. If it's using something with Shell Extensions, we're > probably out. > > What you still can do is using password auth the good old Interix way: > https://cygwin.com/cygwin-ug-net/ntsec.html#ntsec-nopasswd3 Thanks. I took up the suggestion (I think), but I still get different behaviour. I think I should clarify a couple of things. When I said "I definitely logged in.", I meant logged in with a password. As I mentioned, it was your good self who helped me those 20-odd years ago to get past the sqlplus issue. So I always try that ahead of key authentication. Also, I should point out that, "native" SSH works even if the logged in user isn't also logged in via console/RDP session. ie. you can SSH to the newly restarted host, try to dump the contents of the online-only text file, and it will be downloaded, presumably by a forked instance of the One Drive executable. Works for both One Drive, and surprisingly, for Nextcloud. With regards to the old Interix way... I realised that I am quite out of date. I recall, I think in the Vista days, forcing LSA on to overcome some issue... turning it on for any other installation I made, and then encountering some years ago, cyglsa-config disappearing... noting it didn't seem to matter to my original issue, and just not bothering anymore. If I am in the right ballpark, is the suggestion to just cygserver on it's own? If that is the case, I did configure one using cygserver-config, restarted, logged in to check it was running (tick) and attempting the same above scenario (cat an online-only text file). I still see permission denied. I think at this stage, this is just an FYI, unless I've missed the point on cygserver. Because if cygserver can't solve this, I suspect some MS special magic here. Small diversion, it should be noted that cygserver-config is effectively broken. It looks like (from an old cygcheck.old of mine), the service used to be installed under the name cyg_server. The (overridable) default is now just cygserver. Well the script appears to now have some oversight in how it checks for an existing cygserver "service" process in this code: # Check for running cygserver processes first. if ps -ef | grep -v grep | grep -q ${service_name} then echo echo "There is a cygserver (${service_name}) already running. Nothing to do, apparently." echo exit 1 fi Obviously it's trying to filter out it's own grep process and expecting that no other process is listed to proceed. But the script matches ${service_name} by name... which used to be fine, because it wasn't an exact match (as cyg_server). To overcome, I just copied the script and commented it out, because I want to retain the default name... and I don't remember how I have performed exact matches in the past to suggest the patch. -- Regards, Shaddy -- Problem reports: https://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: https://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: https://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: https://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple