DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.2 delorie.com 535FswH6388808 Authentication-Results: delorie.com; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=cygwin.com Authentication-Results: delorie.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=cygwin.com DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 delorie.com 535FswH6388808 Authentication-Results: delorie.com; dkim=pass (1024-bit key, unprotected) header.d=cygwin.com header.i=@cygwin.com header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=default header.b=dqx8HAK9 X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 5B1B83858294 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=cygwin.com; s=default; t=1743868496; bh=NeChccdukdKejgOdmD/X7996GJz19hTzWP4yGKLd/+c=; h=Date:To:cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:List-Id: List-Unsubscribe:List-Archive:List-Post:List-Help:List-Subscribe: From:Reply-To:From; b=dqx8HAK9csWpnytjYjtMAI+8IQ5eIVqMnOkAS3GEoj+EiB25HWw0TFwfcQN5jt7C6 mnVu0RPo+ThR0oxdPeXaO5A0f0hf7GYc6/bXZpFBv7gaCEXJRgsf6OGj2ba0VE44Mu BKtR/aQtvWAec2x/Cp030FkA0U7PUGWs3hOqCtso= X-Original-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.2 sourceware.org 3F4413858294 ARC-Filter: OpenARC Filter v1.0.0 sourceware.org 3F4413858294 ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=sourceware.org; s=key; t=1743868436; cv=none; b=UIrwmRNqVyBWju83k7soQSzUKueW/C4RZIeLkkZp+Y9yWpxsrqHRqJUmDECKPGxBE5kA9kdv2y9lp3+o7Qd52BH3HuG9qvB+l8RrwEucYCPYqUXCs8OsjXdxqnqlQjMhQLrdp5heWfK+1I7zjspgQrie8CMilFPnxfc/KxCLyyo= ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=sourceware.org; s=key; t=1743868436; c=relaxed/simple; bh=jrHmYA7bjrYhDg0kJ+uW6o+JbWWe4yW9GAxGy7qcdj0=; h=DKIM-Signature:Date:From:To:Subject:Message-ID:MIME-Version; b=aOzbeayQk9cA4dkjFVn1oByreu6CSBeQ/8vQFZVS6zMQOjtPq49F1pvooeJvvX18zEgPt3ttcjKbIIJln4+FYIXHzqrw88Bxhpe7sYPWuHZToBcuiHkR6m8OINNZ+gQwl703qyPF5GRhodGd/UFv/DXfkqpjLZBkhub/m5WCDCQ= ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; server2.sourceware.org DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 3F4413858294 Date: Sat, 5 Apr 2025 08:53:55 -0700 (PDT) X-X-Sender: jeremyd AT resin DOT csoft DOT net To: Jon Turney cc: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: dladdr and dll refcount In-Reply-To: <15190784-9033-46f6-b8d5-1136283958fe@dronecode.org.uk> Message-ID: <21539ea0-3742-ff54-76dd-0f2bf495364d@jdrake.com> References: <2ace5ff8-29a2-06a4-6c24-668439d4eb08 AT jdrake DOT com> <15190784-9033-46f6-b8d5-1136283958fe AT dronecode DOT org DOT uk> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.30 Precedence: list List-Id: General Cygwin discussions and problem reports List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , From: Jeremy Drake via Cygwin Reply-To: Jeremy Drake Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: cygwin-bounces~archive-cygwin=delorie DOT com AT cygwin DOT com Sender: "Cygwin" On Sat, 5 Apr 2025, Jon Turney wrote: > On 05/04/2025 06:28, Jeremy Drake via Cygwin wrote: > > I just happened to look at dlfcn.cc dladdr function, and I had a question. > > Should dladdr be using the GET_MODULE_HANDLE_EX_FLAG_UNCHANGED_REFCOUNT > > flag? It doesn't seem like dladdr should be incrementing the refcount. > > Indeed. Well spotted. > > This looks like my mistake back in commit > c8432a01c8401c121940c806a9d868c4adc4cefd > > Assuming that flag is available on all applicable Windows versions, it > certainly looks like we should be using it (otherwise, I guess we just > immediately free the handle). This function (and flag) go back to XP. (I remember this because I was irked about not being able to use it, the company I worked for was supporting old windows versions well past their sell-by date). I'll send a patch. -- Problem reports: https://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: https://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: https://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: https://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple