DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.2 delorie.com 5318dPU52167400
Authentication-Results: delorie.com; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=cygwin.com
Authentication-Results: delorie.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=cygwin.com
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 delorie.com 5318dPU52167400
Authentication-Results: delorie.com;
	dkim=pass (1024-bit key, unprotected) header.d=cygwin.com header.i=@cygwin.com header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=default header.b=LK/hcbKI
X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org E44553840865
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=cygwin.com;
	s=default; t=1743496764;
	bh=kIw+B8dqlyDEZE2bjU7Bth5CFk1s7UlymmzJ7r/uHZw=;
	h=Date:To:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:List-Id:List-Unsubscribe:
	 List-Archive:List-Post:List-Help:List-Subscribe:From:Reply-To:Cc:
	 From;
	b=LK/hcbKIvSv49d3FlpMIFgH5rPu9zHXOFJCTa9zOSegB4JkBQJvtfroSdNGIMaKTr
	 g3dBe9tJ+bOpm2p8jodJHkHi9YV/uoNCzuSfjzcytO0bOwqxjsU1WAbHVGuF8J1mDM
	 r8wNFpU2RhTRt9kj75zmPQpRr2RQOGEtKNGdUOX0=
X-Original-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 0B40D3840C08
Date: Tue, 1 Apr 2025 10:37:57 +0200
To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject: Re: acl man pages {and others?} (Was: symbolic link curiosity in
 3.6.0)
Message-ID: <Z-ul5VpTB_oBnPNE@calimero.vinschen.de>
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
References: <Pine DOT BSF DOT 4 DOT 63 DOT 2503250218240 DOT 74063 AT m0 DOT truegem DOT net>
 <11037686 DOT 3WhfQktd6Z AT nimes> <Z-fINO05FlFrTIUs AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de>
 <7892953 DOT SKYDtnEIZr AT nimes>
 <20b30d5f-2e2d-4abb-a391-5956d98345b8 AT SystematicSW DOT ab DOT ca>
 <jkbpzugorztmkphew4jwoybfwywje5e5xn6dfpbfk2lso6u45o AT eezmf2m57vv2>
 <cwf5m5oemcbqxo2ppgfigglbnmp3dbu6tdkov66wsw45sijunf AT l4boe6wekhs7>
 <a0dce911-e661-45d4-aa6f-d1cc7fb1deba AT systematicsw DOT ab DOT ca>
 <Z-rjxlxWsCZ2T8HN AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de>
 <d0a1d86b-8708-4c44-9b81-dba8a5a667e7 AT systematicsw DOT ab DOT ca>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <d0a1d86b-8708-4c44-9b81-dba8a5a667e7@systematicsw.ab.ca>
X-BeenThere: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.30
Precedence: list
List-Id: General Cygwin discussions and problem reports <cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://cygwin.com/mailman/options/cygwin>,
 <mailto:cygwin-request AT cygwin DOT com?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://cygwin.com/pipermail/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-request AT cygwin DOT com?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://cygwin.com/mailman/listinfo/cygwin>,
 <mailto:cygwin-request AT cygwin DOT com?subject=subscribe>
From: Corinna Vinschen via Cygwin <cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
Reply-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Cc: Corinna Vinschen <corinna-cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Errors-To: cygwin-bounces~archive-cygwin=delorie DOT com AT cygwin DOT com
Sender: "Cygwin" <cygwin-bounces~archive-cygwin=delorie DOT com AT cygwin DOT com>

On Mar 31 23:26, Brian Inglis via Cygwin wrote:
> On 2025-03-31 12:49, Corinna Vinschen via Cygwin wrote:
> > On Mar 31 12:35, Brian Inglis via Cygwin wrote:
> [...]
> > > Has anyone a feel if there are any other projects on that list whose man
> > > pages would be useful under Cygwin even if the package itself is not
> > > available, or even individual man pages where they are not currently
> > > available?
> 
> > We have quite a few functions which might be only available on BSD systems,
> > and we have these Solaris ACL functions which don't exist on Linux.  We
> > probably can't use the man pages from Solaris due to copyright constraints,
> > but the FreeBSD man pages should be ok.
> 
> The Solaris man pages were made available under the CDDL or PDL derived from
> MPL: we have Solaris 10 and OpenSolaris 2010 available on the freebsd.org
> site,
> a well as most other OSes anyone might want: 520 of them, from 7th Edition,
> 2.10BSD, 386BSD, thru 4.4Lite2, .

Oh, great.

> Space required for FreeBSD man pages is comparable to man-pages-linux -
> should we make all FreeBSD 15.0 current man pages available similar to
> man-pages-linux - man-pages-freebsd package and directory under
> /usr/share/man/ symlinked as freebsd for convenience with man -m|--systems
> SYSTEM,...?
> 
> Or should we stick to the original idea and package only selected missing
> man pages in the other sections of posix.xml as man-pages-extra?

Your call.  As long as we don't have dedicated people creating matching
man pages for Cygwin (very unlikely for such a small project), we'll
never have 100% accurate man pages either way.  So it might be a bit too
much hassle to tweak the FreeBSD man pages into a form matching Cygwin.

The only question is, assuming as a user I have have man-pages-linux
and man-pages-freebsd installed.  How do I decide on the command line
which of them I see?


Thanks,
Corinna

-- 
Problem reports:      https://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ:                  https://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation:        https://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info:     https://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple