DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.2 delorie.com 52JAMmfH4016892
Authentication-Results: delorie.com; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=cygwin.com
Authentication-Results: delorie.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=cygwin.com
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 delorie.com 52JAMmfH4016892
Authentication-Results: delorie.com;
	dkim=pass (1024-bit key, unprotected) header.d=cygwin.com header.i=@cygwin.com header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=default header.b=IfUbnwSa
X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 0E5923857C6D
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=cygwin.com;
	s=default; t=1742379767;
	bh=owzUGfjPIfPWMQ/CLffITEVkkTUWHwH3kuBX7yGaMBI=;
	h=Date:To:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:List-Id:List-Unsubscribe:
	 List-Archive:List-Post:List-Help:List-Subscribe:From:Reply-To:Cc:
	 From;
	b=IfUbnwSaTH/IDeGTsAEyDrQDFtBGu/fzJJeD03Yc0GZIhpQGxHsbWOdZbB+J5sVkB
	 PyDyETvjSDdtG2aaVXzGpOBmL7rDR1dxj4wJO6I6AFv4KG95MAB9R1aR2utlIngtpE
	 k9vWit+tR95IP/QhQ2UDzETRKB+fBgN3a6cbivqc=
X-Original-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 7FD193857C6E
Date: Wed, 19 Mar 2025 11:21:40 +0100
To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject: Re: Document support for @ character in UNC paths
Message-ID: <Z9qatEBw7Q5er8hW@calimero.vinschen.de>
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
References: <Z7eSVamMjrs5XsBm AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de>
 <CANH4o6NW7NnygLoRgWmMMV7qY4UwK6vKnVKCRX2u=9MCWhdMdg AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
 <Z7hVWK1_pzYrIzBG AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de>
 <CALWcw=E4kcJ+UbsRkqkFpgRx734H33NhJhspuVH2KgDzV4jL3g AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
 <Z7my7gejHoLjf2F1 AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de>
 <CALWcw=EqzTv-J5pm1DVT8Un+J2QWLtV70nF1nU9DO_P3Cg4OOg AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
 <CALWcw=GDQ0kPGXBXMa3-9LdFX3fjsVdUK-VS1TpwdO_XtFvXMA AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
 <CALWcw=Hmu+tVkqjdF977gBBQFXP1MrqZVWge_srBYEk6R5E0Xw AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
 <Z9nHRsXAKEFH6oCa AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de>
 <CALWcw=HhYtebc-4HcJt0XvmFomue8dPc+1jfCL91t+AjzpnTvA AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <CALWcw=HhYtebc-4HcJt0XvmFomue8dPc+1jfCL91t+AjzpnTvA@mail.gmail.com>
X-BeenThere: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.30
Precedence: list
List-Id: General Cygwin discussions and problem reports <cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://cygwin.com/mailman/options/cygwin>,
 <mailto:cygwin-request AT cygwin DOT com?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://cygwin.com/pipermail/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-request AT cygwin DOT com?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://cygwin.com/mailman/listinfo/cygwin>,
 <mailto:cygwin-request AT cygwin DOT com?subject=subscribe>
From: Corinna Vinschen via Cygwin <cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
Reply-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Cc: Corinna Vinschen <corinna-cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Errors-To: cygwin-bounces~archive-cygwin=delorie DOT com AT cygwin DOT com
Sender: "Cygwin" <cygwin-bounces~archive-cygwin=delorie DOT com AT cygwin DOT com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-MIME-Autoconverted: from base64 to 8bit by delorie.com id 52JAMmfH4016892

On Mar 19 04:31, Takeshi Nishimura via Cygwin wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 18, 2025 at 8:19 PM Corinna Vinschen via Cygwin
> <cygwin AT cygwin DOT com> wrote:
> >
> > On Mar 18 15:57, Takeshi Nishimura via Cygwin wrote:
> > > On Tue, Feb 25, 2025 at 4:59 PM Takeshi Nishimura
> > > <takeshi DOT nishimura DOT linux AT gmail DOT com> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Subject says it all, please document that @ characters in UNC paths
> > > > are now supported, for WebDAV and BeeGFS
> > >
> > > Was this ever added to the Cygwin documentation for Cygwin 3.6?
> >
> > Oops, I'm sorry, I missed that.  It has been silently subsumed under
> > "Expose WebDav shares ..." :}
> >
> > But in fact, apart from supporting the at-sign in filenames, there's
> > nothing in Cygwin actually supporting BeeGFS explicitely.  Does it
> > work so well that there's no reason to special-case it when checking
> > the filesystem?
> 
> I'm using it on a daily basis, no complaints from me. It is usable.

This is nice!


Thanks,
Corinna

-- 
Problem reports:      https://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ:                  https://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation:        https://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info:     https://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple