DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.2 delorie.com 518ISETH3402422 Authentication-Results: delorie.com; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=cygwin.com Authentication-Results: delorie.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=cygwin.com DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 delorie.com 518ISETH3402422 Authentication-Results: delorie.com; dkim=pass (1024-bit key, unprotected) header.d=cygwin.com header.i=@cygwin.com header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=default header.b=hveLQtzV X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 67E1E385772C DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=cygwin.com; s=default; t=1739039292; bh=Px3fib5Kb1K++uqLkU7bFtbu5xpNk38zQY93FdpMD10=; h=Date:To:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:List-Id:List-Unsubscribe: List-Archive:List-Post:List-Help:List-Subscribe:From:Reply-To: From; b=hveLQtzVYdPscoxDxGR0MVtQ4Rwb3nTldRZIIdUqh5fNZg5TkM0IGcMRwRJ4PJ4e3 4kqBMk4gCoBYF/C8Gkw68dx9QDvifXgObe5nQdSy8S8fWLEJZQ37Bv/6IyrcZErUod R6+UfJq/qLZZ9wHzOEvnVTPGrS3795+Fo0CoJ/KU= X-Original-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.2 sourceware.org 134F03858D38 ARC-Filter: OpenARC Filter v1.0.0 sourceware.org 134F03858D38 ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=sourceware.org; s=key; t=1739039269; cv=none; b=jO3r1Fk8Bk56KS+Om6ZGlnWG4WtIWe45313kjrk22RINN8KZQnneoD7HVGoX1jFYpsWSmMsX6U2VSbjUFALBq+NDG7lLfH0zKARAR+2hf/qIN6OkwbrF7hVr9GdH/1mCMbWmIJ//r14AMJsEqxrgp+Tssq64oKW4EiC5enu6cFQ= ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=sourceware.org; s=key; t=1739039269; c=relaxed/simple; bh=ogYm1+j1BC+DqE9onFbCobGkQ6hUSjvmvWMLkvfpbK8=; h=DKIM-Signature:Date:From:To:Subject:Message-ID:MIME-Version; b=sxhFbGv0yWRT/2YtEEG11p+Iu1/Fu9x1Bn2ffA3V9P6LhSb8J/xPAtFzInn7YsoU0jZhpH/cooIw6Kx63sOW7KvInQqZyG5tYw29pS6raBFWP69SzsbCP3lnLzJbrqpkI1B0DhoKLorp6LMKjL7eS6iGyXwhj1OCbjkjAJ0unrM= ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; server2.sourceware.org DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 134F03858D38 Date: Sat, 8 Feb 2025 10:27:48 -0800 (PST) X-X-Sender: jeremyd AT resin DOT csoft DOT net To: Corinna Vinschen via Cygwin Subject: Re: exposing Windows mountpoints in Cygwin In-Reply-To: Message-ID: References: <09960367-4427-2929-9b12-17cc2a15f5c3 AT jdrake DOT com> <474a8899-2c92-ad8a-09c5-f86314213e94 AT jdrake DOT com> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.30 Precedence: list List-Id: General Cygwin discussions and problem reports List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , From: Jeremy Drake via Cygwin Reply-To: Jeremy Drake Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: cygwin-bounces~archive-cygwin=delorie DOT com AT cygwin DOT com Sender: "Cygwin" On Sat, 8 Feb 2025, Corinna Vinschen via Cygwin wrote: > Go for it. There's already matching logic in fhandler/proc.cc, > function format_proc_partitions() for the "win-mounts" column > of /proc/partitions. Probably this can be reused. Actually closer to the dos_drive_mappings at the end of mount.cc, except that only looks at the first mount point. But, reusing anything might be difficult due to having to save state and resume iteration on subsequent calls. Open to suggestions on https://cygwin.com/pipermail/cygwin-patches/2025q1/013353.html. -- Problem reports: https://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: https://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: https://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: https://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple