DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.2 delorie.com 50OMHb8f543511
Authentication-Results: delorie.com; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=cygwin.com
Authentication-Results: delorie.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=cygwin.com
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 delorie.com 50OMHb8f543511
Authentication-Results: delorie.com;
	dkim=pass (1024-bit key, unprotected) header.d=cygwin.com header.i=@cygwin.com header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=default header.b=nbK6WxcJ
X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org D36D63858C60
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=cygwin.com;
	s=default; t=1737757055;
	bh=+JUBGXliPjY0DZObkGcD2YJwm7TkFFaFJ3wBc40mMVE=;
	h=Date:To:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:List-Id:List-Unsubscribe:
	 List-Archive:List-Post:List-Help:List-Subscribe:From:Reply-To:
	 From;
	b=nbK6WxcJtyeM6ekoZq2sLIZHqdtMBW2V8+AiduOHWtrqxwo9p7ThTJbzesaEqplEO
	 98PDkDIeVvDdgMLjwJTCMWJfLveHEPmfSs3Obh2ZIXJYyTx/28incCY+/TxqdKp4LC
	 ce4KBuLyCSwbnq9tz4DuXMkMUxoui5RxWT5qah9k=
X-Original-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.2 sourceware.org 81B7B3858D1E
ARC-Filter: OpenARC Filter v1.0.0 sourceware.org 81B7B3858D1E
ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=sourceware.org; s=key; t=1737757028; cv=none;
 b=DMbmhCBXWN6nQr15VxsXyH/e7eiKTHIqHh0m5fLKUNDODu+xox8IffWP1JneTfng2PHZXONQJKLbjDe3UZR0W/ygYXMxjZj3TbKfWwVAz4sg/rn4eYkvgm79Z3qoDNNS9/jo6hkZJuFjDsxdMT3g3++SihOasxidop0JjOlN0Ug=
ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=sourceware.org; s=key;
 t=1737757028; c=relaxed/simple;
 bh=ZZS50BJEGINVYr0h6PLn0Ax3xyKtLlYKMFb8h9oYvrc=;
 h=Date:From:To:Subject:Message-Id:Mime-Version:DKIM-Signature;
 b=siEIeg9QWSaDLn4PyyCsTs2z76z8zCcFetiY3E6sXzXm13Xxp7fitPT0/SdEuwi3tEvhUpHQhsaS1kVNETTC8LdmVwoNFmPQFQl8SdYfQinexChx0cL0m7VEzIGstXwC0UtMY/HX0jTDaCr9FSvZT5qUUE+KWnmUybK6D7Rogu4=
ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; server2.sourceware.org
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 81B7B3858D1E
Date: Sat, 25 Jan 2025 07:17:03 +0900
To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject: Re: Hangs in cygwin 3.5.5-1: should 3.5.5-1 be rolled back?
Message-Id: <20250125071703.8a286e3f1b567096521ee35c@nifty.ne.jp>
In-Reply-To: <116ca422-83a8-4d8d-afe7-7fa1e7188844@michael-soegtrop.de>
References: <e64d01c0-ecad-4427-a0b4-1b30b4b45ed9 AT yahoo DOT de>
 <7d3aa20f-45b8-44a8-a353-a374d082c0b5 AT yahoo DOT de>
 <20250114085736 DOT 907bf487dfb51d0c5e11c402 AT nifty DOT ne DOT jp>
 <1f8ef908-4ea4-2248-8f2f-de3304fc2ee0 AT jdrake DOT com>
 <20250123194639 DOT 1c563ef7b5313ce5b35bf16b AT nifty DOT ne DOT jp>
 <Z5JV1oLwDZopPuNM AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de>
 <116ca422-83a8-4d8d-afe7-7fa1e7188844 AT michael-soegtrop DOT de>
X-Mailer: Sylpheed 3.7.0 (GTK+ 2.24.30; i686-pc-mingw32)
Mime-Version: 1.0
X-BeenThere: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.30
Precedence: list
List-Id: General Cygwin discussions and problem reports <cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://cygwin.com/mailman/options/cygwin>,
 <mailto:cygwin-request AT cygwin DOT com?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://cygwin.com/pipermail/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-request AT cygwin DOT com?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://cygwin.com/mailman/listinfo/cygwin>,
 <mailto:cygwin-request AT cygwin DOT com?subject=subscribe>
From: Takashi Yano via Cygwin <cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
Reply-To: Takashi Yano <takashi DOT yano AT nifty DOT ne DOT jp>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Errors-To: cygwin-bounces~archive-cygwin=delorie DOT com AT cygwin DOT com
Sender: "Cygwin" <cygwin-bounces~archive-cygwin=delorie DOT com AT cygwin DOT com>

On Fri, 24 Jan 2025 10:55:18 +0100
Michael Soegtrop wrote:
> Dear Cygwin Team,
> 
> I just wanted to confirm that I haven't seen issues with recent test 
> releases. But the test versions change to fast to say conclusively that 
> each of the versions are OK.
> 
> The last version for which I did see failures was:
> 
> 3.6.0-0.321.g23f4aac7e760 (2 failures in 10 runs)
> 
> This version was stable for a few days but then started to fail - 
> possibly some other package changed but it could also be random. If this 
> is of interest, I can research this or send you pointers to the package 
> lists in the logs. If it is random, the statistics gathered so far on 
> later releases are not conclusive.
> 
> I had *no* failures with:
> 
> 3.6.0-0.327.gca22984cc4ad (4 runs)
> 
> 3.6.0-0.336.g2cc4d14f2a02 (2 runs)
> 
> 3.6.0-0.338.ge0bc8172712(2 runs)
> 
> 3.6.0-0.343.gbf94b87f54de(2 runs)

Thanks for testing!

> If you have a release candidate, I can run more thorough tests, but it 
> should be stable then for 2 days.

We have no plan for release candidate, but will release 3.5.6
in a few days.

-- 
Takashi Yano <takashi DOT yano AT nifty DOT ne DOT jp>

-- 
Problem reports:      https://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ:                  https://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation:        https://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info:     https://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple