DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.2 delorie.com 4BR79xoR801436
Authentication-Results: delorie.com; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=cygwin.com
Authentication-Results: delorie.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=cygwin.com
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 delorie.com 4BR79xoR801436
Authentication-Results: delorie.com;
	dkim=pass (1024-bit key, unprotected) header.d=cygwin.com header.i=@cygwin.com header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=default header.b=vz0hCrsi
X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 731223858C98
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=cygwin.com;
	s=default; t=1735283397;
	bh=BLIXZ/z4zLTUr1ka/wJfjjQG9+iUOwd3W/KRWV4+oQs=;
	h=References:In-Reply-To:Date:Subject:To:List-Id:List-Unsubscribe:
	 List-Archive:List-Post:List-Help:List-Subscribe:From:Reply-To:
	 From;
	b=vz0hCrsiHxJcv+m9wR2HXK3bKUqyGsjucbzcKKw7N4RKo5WDCPmcnHmTehjunvi+9
	 y6wK71u68jAFI0y5YkLV6M7esQ28WyGgkNEK1Q3lXvGEIuhT47fX46vmBq93iFt5Kf
	 8EZXLpf6/rcZgmoJxeASuIKtam5wpixF/Qwmr+oQ=
X-Original-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.2 sourceware.org CB3A83858D20
ARC-Filter: OpenARC Filter v1.0.0 sourceware.org CB3A83858D20
ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=sourceware.org; s=key; t=1735283370; cv=none;
 b=CrAhjSak4WjS22bcuKAZhLssNpWMr8V4WOulx6zNG6qyh3Ls3Asaa0+DsK+5jOGzcPkmvfXoGRbcBXC2KFmUrwMLt3k9lgmBcFdElGp0T0tToJ4lDDnx1n21FZWoRd53QrxE5CcqqL/SI/H+a4hcoE/88E9XO1FZw2VVwAUj3Os=
ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=sourceware.org; s=key;
 t=1735283370; c=relaxed/simple;
 bh=BvEtV6BcF0T9nj96FSEG+LmvmX1ex0PHt3fW6/O5f0c=;
 h=DKIM-Signature:MIME-Version:From:Date:Message-ID:Subject:To;
 b=aplRu+uyGQI11wM+w5zQpEGPiZOqDOP9Ccjo6Z2XEKIQk3fDqCBEQMgO4kvZkFg1w1P7tOPoSxVDNFvWgoLgrRGDtw2TGc//FnQd+1XIV2wrwflJAbMOLG7qyrXhAsgAFmiY/iRw6t7tvbm0gwuNxSBwwLL+CiDG3qIcAEnRX4k=
ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; server2.sourceware.org
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org CB3A83858D20
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
 d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1735283367; x=1735888167;
 h=to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references:mime-version
 :x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to;
 bh=RcaDJ2rw4upS80Brl9YQZG+bdZ706KqXY8SRQ6T3xSA=;
 b=B/5Oh7Ze5qG/ZGrVvxtk9fvbe7+g0y3E8Ssal6qaNNMmtUXPYwcaiK7PmuQlxlB9D/
 E97FQfi322GaW9zmkAtQAUQKsgk8KGUxfeFO8fPh8gfgvt81Vz3Uy/bJVTbvQaPT0v9V
 1mzgfF9QVYmBY0vt1Oa9CFJEiig9K6V0y+b5tXx/VrbVoxax9FGHekAHl1wm+4VrPg11
 QGUAqQ2MJlHcSmoLCnsmPFRJ3ULbkOj1pLPEypueGns2nVCreDHeohiIBe+pCYnh9WzI
 IMyhfzylZTHoDqTENGPeSkVnmf2Z4Y/ee3J2W858tysY5X0JD2UjGfysF2VKjHLvMejm
 UoUg==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0Yy8wl1QLw2ZPLAuCbJfU34LK4aHMKIY1H1Ri5JpGFCSDSmGToJA
 so0Osy4jkXHBAvLGZiZ5DWG3sas3WDfgHdx3r4fHJiScJboFi2TXft1E4E/8CEV4qaFNndH4V58
 J0oNxPOCObsUmz1UzVhTWEg1lY6g3hw==
X-Gm-Gg: ASbGncufaBM7004ElhNBwnt23Vqo6bbQaGKRsQ1lSKIttJWrXacYVoLV0MRV5+vLgXP
 0fmvB087cCwgH+qr/pxuclPAhRDRsuKYvcmEthpM=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IEdHhc9aaxplPin8Xuvc/FMB7FMwkiK2VCNv7IvcGYKvPqBknQoGa7pwkO/796/dH5d/1Rqpf6AELVDh1kOtHg=
X-Received: by 2002:a05:6402:11c7:b0:5d0:b51c:8489 with SMTP id
 4fb4d7f45d1cf-5d81ddc01abmr19072662a12.12.1735283367421; Thu, 26 Dec 2024
 23:09:27 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <3393531 DOT CAdn2TfLgq AT nimes>
 <20241226091158 DOT 0062450b05fd2ba9f46d7f63 AT nifty DOT ne DOT jp>
In-Reply-To: <20241226091158.0062450b05fd2ba9f46d7f63@nifty.ne.jp>
Date: Fri, 27 Dec 2024 08:09:00 +0100
Message-ID: <CALXu0UerYLToZXh_aHvA9-ufrhsH7x4LvJbOW=v32JPxag+5FA@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: raise() produces random behaviour in Cygwin 3.5.5
To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
X-BeenThere: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.30
List-Id: General Cygwin discussions and problem reports <cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Archive: <https://cygwin.com/pipermail/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-request AT cygwin DOT com?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://cygwin.com/mailman/listinfo/cygwin>,
 <mailto:cygwin-request AT cygwin DOT com?subject=subscribe>
From: Cedric Blancher via Cygwin <cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
Reply-To: Cedric Blancher <cedric DOT blancher AT gmail DOT com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: "Cygwin" <cygwin-bounces~archive-cygwin=delorie DOT com AT cygwin DOT com>

On Thu, 26 Dec 2024 at 01:12, Takashi Yano via Cygwin <cygwin AT cygwin DOT com> wrote:
>
> On Wed, 25 Dec 2024 07:21:44 +0100
> Bruno Haible wrote:
> > This unit test is part of Gnulib. Really, it is a pity that none of the
> > Cygwin maintainers is running the Gnulib tests before making a new Cygwin
> > release.
>
> We once discussed necessity of the test suite for cygwin before.
> Do you think the test cases of Gnulib appropriate for the purpose?

1. SUS (Single UNIX Standard) has a conformance test suite, which
covers a VAST amount of tests. Maybe that can be used, as Corinna
works at Redhat, which has access to the test suite?
2. bash has a test suite, which currently (Cygwin 3.6.0, 27 Dec 2024) does hang
3. ksh93/AST has a test suite, which also hangs with Cygwin 3.6
4. stressng has lots of tests which currently fail with Cygwin 3.6

So there is plenty to choose from, but IMO it should be part of a CI

Ced
-- 
Cedric Blancher <cedric DOT blancher AT gmail DOT com>
[https://plus.google.com/u/0/+CedricBlancher/]
Institute Pasteur

-- 
Problem reports:      https://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ:                  https://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation:        https://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info:     https://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple