DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.2 delorie.com 4BPE2xxK4117266
Authentication-Results: delorie.com; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=cygwin.com
Authentication-Results: delorie.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=cygwin.com
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 delorie.com 4BPE2xxK4117266
Authentication-Results: delorie.com;
	dkim=pass (1024-bit key, unprotected) header.d=cygwin.com header.i=@cygwin.com header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=default header.b=gFgbhlQM
X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 0C9723858C78
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=cygwin.com;
	s=default; t=1735135378;
	bh=RlXPoU5BGEZrI/oc/ebTy2X+pif4oy40pylD0cQ0+RU=;
	h=Date:To:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:List-Id:List-Unsubscribe:
	 List-Archive:List-Post:List-Help:List-Subscribe:From:Reply-To:
	 From;
	b=gFgbhlQMNObffM3jhPC1tZQU8t71+8bzcCrrpGKaHkupmkkXgyzdyqIlVrsmAzSih
	 +CD9TtMyMBfbS0wFR9plT9AiHCMxriY5xurUlx/6CLceOWJFTb/onURCZxWYyI4DN/
	 BUJKO/KTdFYPFHa7axRETbUHkWIc1vAGTHxZb5RY=
X-Original-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.2 sourceware.org 3BC603858C48
ARC-Filter: OpenARC Filter v1.0.0 sourceware.org 3BC603858C48
ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=sourceware.org; s=key; t=1735135320; cv=none;
 b=nR9nOMOU6tFwRObTO1k4zYwn6IxA200YXPAn6yKA3O1nfjIqRZ3WsRq3M1qive6l7TqCTFhVM4Nia2NshYjXwPSc+n9vrtR28Ch8F4XPVLLyKCCqHRFecomCrtE6Dz7zSQ6hp1dhNvhzDTscY+cTbJOXgLzPi+e70RcKCqibVug=
ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=sourceware.org; s=key;
 t=1735135320; c=relaxed/simple;
 bh=eGffyXuVpCer2uIKjf5m3w1tUfDEBUG2opj3oKuOcvw=;
 h=Date:From:To:Subject:Message-Id:Mime-Version:DKIM-Signature;
 b=QpViRzu3tmuuBtA7mbHRQ4cwjFsMrIosoecKNuZgLkx2gPwXeiJQTJcostkNkA+W1kyFDSetqgPPcQ3vXRVHXGsj1Wzr2J8hrnKAEPmasDbqkgKl6ewoZReoZW+7I5ERnrYiDAxyzSXYtKsuyVhItz/1lKdZW079v8cRIICuxM8=
ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; server2.sourceware.org
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 3BC603858C48
Date: Wed, 25 Dec 2024 23:01:57 +0900
To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject: Re: raise() produces random behaviour in Cygwin 3.5.5
Message-Id: <20241225230157.d1cde6bfcafb13ab7eeb7665@nifty.ne.jp>
In-Reply-To: <3393531.CAdn2TfLgq@nimes>
References: <3393531 DOT CAdn2TfLgq AT nimes>
X-Mailer: Sylpheed 3.7.0 (GTK+ 2.24.30; i686-pc-mingw32)
Mime-Version: 1.0
X-BeenThere: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.30
Precedence: list
List-Id: General Cygwin discussions and problem reports <cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://cygwin.com/mailman/options/cygwin>,
 <mailto:cygwin-request AT cygwin DOT com?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://cygwin.com/pipermail/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-request AT cygwin DOT com?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://cygwin.com/mailman/listinfo/cygwin>,
 <mailto:cygwin-request AT cygwin DOT com?subject=subscribe>
From: Takashi Yano via Cygwin <cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
Reply-To: Takashi Yano <takashi DOT yano AT nifty DOT ne DOT jp>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Errors-To: cygwin-bounces~archive-cygwin=delorie DOT com AT cygwin DOT com
Sender: "Cygwin" <cygwin-bounces~archive-cygwin=delorie DOT com AT cygwin DOT com>

On Wed, 25 Dec 2024 07:21:44 +0100
Bruno Haible wrote:
> An invocation of raise(SIGABRT), that is, of a synchronous signal, produces
> random behaviour in Cygwin 3.5.5: Sometimes it succeeds, sometimes it fails
> with error ENOSYS. In previous releases of Cygwin and in all other operating
> systems, it always succeeds.
> 
> How to reproduce:
> Find test-sigaction.c attached.
> Compile it and run it 10 times:
> $ x86_64-pc-cygwin-gcc -O2 -Wall test-sigaction.c \
>   && ./a && ./a && ./a && ./a && ./a && ./a && ./a && ./a && ./a && ./a
> ret = -1, errno = 88
> ret = -1, errno = 88
> ret = 0, errno = 0
> ret = -1, errno = 88
> ret = -1, errno = 88
> ret = -1, errno = 88
> ret = -1, errno = 88
> ret = -1, errno = 88
> ret = -1, errno = 88
> ret = 0, errno = 0
> 
> This unit test is part of Gnulib. Really, it is a pity that none of the
> Cygwin maintainers is running the Gnulib tests before making a new Cygwin
> release.

Thanks for the report. This issue will be fixed by the patch:
https://cygwin.com/pipermail/cygwin-patches/2024q4/013145.html

-- 
Takashi Yano <takashi DOT yano AT nifty DOT ne DOT jp>

-- 
Problem reports:      https://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ:                  https://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation:        https://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info:     https://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple