DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.2 delorie.com 4BCDvK8k1972850 Authentication-Results: delorie.com; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=cygwin.com Authentication-Results: delorie.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=cygwin.com DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 delorie.com 4BCDvK8k1972850 Authentication-Results: delorie.com; dkim=pass (1024-bit key, unprotected) header.d=cygwin.com header.i=@cygwin.com header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=default header.b=OcA0+Trk X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 258623858C32 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=cygwin.com; s=default; t=1734011840; bh=CeU5OfQdwTdZbhIP7X+RIxzdbSFw1DNaKFxrFzeLYn0=; h=Date:To:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:List-Id:List-Unsubscribe: List-Archive:List-Post:List-Help:List-Subscribe:From:Reply-To: From; b=OcA0+TrkVmbWfCJiEkAVfDNwQpzFvaux3uayGqMT7nSKrOiyxb+625EjBunrQfC2I L9bDM2lksc61BgyS0ZYscfQvjBpTxeqg+TfdZmWCbfDI/jAIE90Fisd+hwwR7qJQES dK97iO4O0BecaG2igNo2gqoztOK3lWYidZEqLxXI= X-Original-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.2 sourceware.org 56D3E3858D39 ARC-Filter: OpenARC Filter v1.0.0 sourceware.org 56D3E3858D39 ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=sourceware.org; s=key; t=1734011808; cv=none; b=BGPt8ocXlzR+dOiyEpRVf5RhJBq7rPhHLY2UHvEddJiANHqZB+m6wMQhYLfcixNhP+wXDXnK+4h7qCzE0n0mzVA1ndiDcC/en5Z6GVPQN3JwTohc+W3tMzRDa8xTp+JOu2zpRIIvShxj8CgrvuBeUttQPRp+AZCmeN5WW1KZcxk= ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=sourceware.org; s=key; t=1734011808; c=relaxed/simple; bh=aNlfFsrgZQLsPe8gCZtu1RBRxSvYSgwwFbcL9ZrxOs0=; h=Date:From:To:Subject:Message-Id:Mime-Version:DKIM-Signature; b=LhDRbuH9Hd1Husr+ikLTy0AyTeeycsvgDAopvBAo/2AZftGdbvoQhLuPAyUw+oqh/rQO6yNWKdSpF23DDeF8DjIJRjd8g/SBXrnhix4Aix6L8HriAXKXcuRQ1GLib/R7IjkjLMOamQ7LUtzBdmQXAzu25j4izpDOnIDeDw1EmC0= ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; server2.sourceware.org DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 56D3E3858D39 Date: Thu, 12 Dec 2024 22:56:31 +0900 To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: procps can work Message-Id: <20241212225631.6e940a2caeba079577a2539e@nifty.ne.jp> In-Reply-To: References: <20241212142517 DOT 5718c29573457aad0cbee671 AT nifty DOT ne DOT jp> <20241212170927 DOT 94b70a7bccd8926156b005ab AT nifty DOT ne DOT jp> <20241212215357 DOT 9816faca5514fe0145bc16f3 AT nifty DOT ne DOT jp> X-Mailer: Sylpheed 3.7.0 (GTK+ 2.24.30; i686-pc-mingw32) Mime-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.30 Precedence: list List-Id: General Cygwin discussions and problem reports List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , From: Takashi Yano via Cygwin Reply-To: Takashi Yano Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Errors-To: cygwin-bounces~archive-cygwin=delorie DOT com AT cygwin DOT com Sender: "Cygwin" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-MIME-Autoconverted: from base64 to 8bit by delorie.com id 4BCDvK8k1972850 On Thu, 12 Dec 2024 21:48:05 +0800 凯夏 wrote: > 31 AT 21:47:19#xiakai1 AT tp/~> /usr/bin/ps|wc -l > 146 > 31 AT 21:47:21#xiakai1 AT tp/~> > about 146 processes It is possibly just due to too many processes for procps, isn't it? I tested procps with 200 processes (sleep 100) and it took about 10 seconds. What kind of CPU does your machine have? -- Takashi Yano -- Problem reports: https://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: https://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: https://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: https://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple